Applications of Hesitant Interval Neutrosophic Linguistic Schweizer-Sklar Power Aggregation Operators to MADM

Abstract

Hesitant interval neutrosophic linguistic sets (HINLSs) are one of the core generalization of various sets, such as neutrosophic set (NS), interval neutrosophic set (INS), and interval neutrosophic linguistic set (INLS). HINLS can represent the uncertainty, inconsistency, and reluctance of assessment specialists by expressing qualitative and quantitative information. The goal of this article is to introduce a novel MADM technique that can account for changes in the semantic environment as well as negative consequences of experts’ excessive evaluation values. First, several innovative operational rules based on Schweizer-Sklar (SS) t -norm and t -conorm and a novel comparison procedure for HINLS are established by integrating different linguistic scale functions. This allows for varied semantic settings to be handled. Then, various innovative HINL Schweizer-Sklar power aggregation operators (AOs) are suggested, containing hesitant interval neutrosophic SS power average (HINLSSPA) operator, weighted hesitant interval neutrosophic SS power average (WHINLSSPA) operator, hesitant interval neutrosophic SS power geometric average (HINLSSPGA) operator, weighted hesitant interval neutrosophic SS power geometric average (WHINLSSPGA) operator, some core properties, and various special cases of these AOs are examined. Additionally, based on the initiated AOs, a multiple attribute decision making (MADM) technique with HINL information is anticipated. Finally, a numerical example is illustrated to show the effectiveness and practicality of the anticipated MADM method. A comparison with existing approaches are also discussed.

Retracted: Applications of Hesitant Interval Neutrosophic Linguistic Schweizer-Sklar Power Aggregation Operators to MADM

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”