New Frontiers in Graph Theory 2012
DOI: 10.5772/36314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of Graphical Clustering Algorithms in Genome Wide Association Mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FastIndep has been used for finding unlinked markers in data sets with very complex Linkage Disequilibrium patterns such as [ 17 ] where the extent of Linkage Disequilbrium in the ancestral populations varies so much that there is no easy way to use map information alone to select a set of independent markers. Retaining all the markers in [ 17 ] for analyzing population stratification along the lines of STRUCTURE [ 18 ] leads to poor convergence, however the use of a maximal independent set of markers selected along the lines of [ 8 ] leads to much better results because the algorithm in [ 8 ] ignores map information in selecting markers. As an added feature, the randomized nature of the algorithm permits the generation of multiple different sets of markers which can be successively used in the analysis of population stratification to ensure that the final results are independent of the choice of the set of markers; this procedure has been followed in [ 17 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…FastIndep has been used for finding unlinked markers in data sets with very complex Linkage Disequilibrium patterns such as [ 17 ] where the extent of Linkage Disequilbrium in the ancestral populations varies so much that there is no easy way to use map information alone to select a set of independent markers. Retaining all the markers in [ 17 ] for analyzing population stratification along the lines of STRUCTURE [ 18 ] leads to poor convergence, however the use of a maximal independent set of markers selected along the lines of [ 8 ] leads to much better results because the algorithm in [ 8 ] ignores map information in selecting markers. As an added feature, the randomized nature of the algorithm permits the generation of multiple different sets of markers which can be successively used in the analysis of population stratification to ensure that the final results are independent of the choice of the set of markers; this procedure has been followed in [ 17 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current implementation of FastIndep is closely related to the one described in [ 8 ] for the purpose of selecting a large subset of unlinked markers for analyzing population stratification and will be briefly described below. The key idea behind the algorithm is to start with a deterministic greedy heuristic (which typically finds a reasonably large maximal independent set), and then randomize the heuristic in order to explore solutions close to the one found by the deterministic algorithm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation