2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101641
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of computer vision and machine learning techniques for digitized herbarium specimens: A systematic literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our team of seven labelers has logged more than 2000 hours to generate the 494,766 annotations used to train LeafMachine2. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive manually annotated training data set for herbarium specimen analysis to date (Hussein et al, 2022 ). We labeled images using an academic license for the Labelbox platform ( https://labelbox.com ), which enabled our labeling team to annotate images remotely, programmatically manage large data sets with the Labelbox API, employ machine‐assisted labeling (MAL), and review labels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our team of seven labelers has logged more than 2000 hours to generate the 494,766 annotations used to train LeafMachine2. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive manually annotated training data set for herbarium specimen analysis to date (Hussein et al, 2022 ). We labeled images using an academic license for the Labelbox platform ( https://labelbox.com ), which enabled our labeling team to annotate images remotely, programmatically manage large data sets with the Labelbox API, employ machine‐assisted labeling (MAL), and review labels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these limitations, many groups turned to machine learning algorithms, typically some kind of convolutional neural network (CNN), which can categorize individual pixels as members of discrete classes (Ott et al, 2020; Weaver et al, 2020; Younis et al, 2020; Triki et al, 2020, 2021; Goëau et al, 2020, 2022; Guo et al, 2021; Love et al, 2021; Hussein et al, 2021b; Gu et al, 2022; Ott and Lautenschlager, 2022; Milleville et al, 2023). For the task of isolating and measuring individual leaves, semantic segmentation algorithms still lack the power to resolve complex situations (e.g., overlapping leaves) because they produce one mask that contains all leaf pixels and require postprocessing to obtain usable results (Weaver et al, 2020; Hussein et al, 2021b, 2022). Instance segmentation algorithms improve on this as they can directly isolate a single leaf from nearby leaves (Guo et al, 2021; Triki et al, 2021).…”
Section: Term Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Machine learning and artificial intelligence has been successfully applied to digital herbarium specimens in applications such as species identification (Soltis et al 2020), the identification of rare and red listed taxa (Rocchetti et al 2021), the identification of phenology stages of the specimens (Pearson et al 2020), to extract leaf trait data (Weaver et al 2020), and to identify types and levels of herbivory (Meineke et al 2020). Such technological advances can be applied to digital Arctic specimens and can vastly advance our ability to inform a multitude of evolutionary and ecological studies in a rapidly changing landscape (Hussein et al 2022).…”
Section: Arctic Specimens For Global Change Research and Nature Manag...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, machine learning algorithms are starting to be developed for automated trait assessments, as well as for improved modelling of population genetic patterns (e.g. Hussein et al, 2021; Schrider & Kern, 2018).…”
Section: Challenges Associated With Historical Collections and How To...mentioning
confidence: 99%