2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10142-008-0086-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of computational algorithm tools to identify functional SNPs

Abstract: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common type of genetic variations in humans. Understanding the functions of SNPs can greatly help to understand the genetics of the human phenotype variation and especially the genetic basis of human complex diseases. The method to identify functional SNPs from a pool, containing both functional and neutral SNPs is challenging by experimental protocols. To explore possible relationships between genetic mutation and phenotypic variation, different computationa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the p53 gene, TP53 located on chromosome 17p13.1, three tagSNPs were selected by reducing the MAF with 5% increments until three tagSNPs could be selected with a MAF higher than 5%. Two potentially functional SNPs were added (rs16956880 and rs11575997) that could have an effect on splicing [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the p53 gene, TP53 located on chromosome 17p13.1, three tagSNPs were selected by reducing the MAF with 5% increments until three tagSNPs could be selected with a MAF higher than 5%. Two potentially functional SNPs were added (rs16956880 and rs11575997) that could have an effect on splicing [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often time consuming and laborious to study the molecular basis of diseases like cancers, especially in cases where the number of mutations is very high. By contrast, detailed and useful information regarding the effect of nsSNP on protein structure and function can be readily obtained by in silico methods [2, 4]. Prioritizing the most interesting and likely pathogenic cases for further experimental analysis is another important application of the tested prediction methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In attaining this milestone, profiling the most common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by computational approach became powerful and inexpensive enough to jumpstart the personalized genomics area [14]. SNPs are not only considered as markers in constructing genetic maps but also have the potential as direct functional polymorphic variants involved within complex diseases, as well as drug response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that conservation degree is in fact the most reliable method for predicting possible pathogenicity of a missense variant (Flanagan et al, 2010). For the purpose of both prioritization and functional analysis optimization, we recommend combining available annotation tools that employ a variety of prioritization features (George et al, 2008;Lee and Shatkay, 2008). A recent study implemented some of these variation classification methods on recorded SNPs in a target gene, in order to elucidate possible cancer causing mutations, reducing the initial number of suspected SNPs from thousands to less than 30 (Choura and Rebai, 2009).…”
Section: Variant Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%