2014
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.12219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of airborne lidar for the assessment of animal species diversity

Abstract: Summary1. Habitat structure is important in explaining species diversity patterns for many animal groups. If we could map habitat structure over large spatial scales, we could use habitat structure-species diversity (HS-SD) relationships to model species diversity and inform conservation planning and management. Traditional approaches for measuring habitat structure cannot be applied over entire landscapes, but remote sensing tools are now able to overcome this limitation. Here, we explore the potential of air… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At regional scale and national to continental coverage, not only satellite-based sensor products may be considered but also airborne sensors. Airborne LIDAR has been identified to hold especially high potential for biodiversity monitoring (Simonson et al, 2014;Zlinszky et al, 2015b) due to its ability to capture three-dimensional spatial structure in high resolution together with radiometric properties in a spectral band relevant for ecophysiology. Studies have proven that LIDAR can be used even on its own for detailed phytosociological classification or vegetation health studies, both in forests (Maltamo et al, 2014) and in herbaceous vegetation (Zlinszky et al, , 2012.…”
Section: Natura 2000 and Essential Biodiversity Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At regional scale and national to continental coverage, not only satellite-based sensor products may be considered but also airborne sensors. Airborne LIDAR has been identified to hold especially high potential for biodiversity monitoring (Simonson et al, 2014;Zlinszky et al, 2015b) due to its ability to capture three-dimensional spatial structure in high resolution together with radiometric properties in a spectral band relevant for ecophysiology. Studies have proven that LIDAR can be used even on its own for detailed phytosociological classification or vegetation health studies, both in forests (Maltamo et al, 2014) and in herbaceous vegetation (Zlinszky et al, , 2012.…”
Section: Natura 2000 and Essential Biodiversity Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The texture derived from satellite images has also been shown to provide useful information for habitat analysis [43][44][45]. As for ALS data, they have proven especially useful for providing information about fine-scale habitat heterogeneity and structure, a fundamental correlate of species diversity (e.g., [46,47]). The habitat analysis can be done by deriving information about known habitat requirements or by relating metrics from the ALS data to field observations of species distribution [48].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the structural heterogeneity could be one of the main drivers of variation in species richness due to the patterns formed in the gap-to-understory environments [18]. This kind of variable has also been used as an indicator of the vertical structure of vegetation for biodiversity studies related to other taxonomic groups such as mammals, reptiles, and insects [55].…”
Section: Ecological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, it is also notable that resampling the predictor variables at differing spatial resolutions that more adequately reflect the field situation improved the prediction. The selection and concern of the spatial resolution have relevant implications in ecological studies [49] and within the taxonomical groups considered [55]. The consideration of different grain size of the selected predictors has been used mainly in studies on regional and continental scales [56,[64][65][66].…”
Section: Spatial Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%