2011
DOI: 10.2528/pierl11082213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of a Three-Dimensional FDTD Method With Weakly Conditional Stability to the Analysis of Microstrip Filters With Fine Scale Structures

Abstract: In three-dimensional space, the hybrid implicit-explicit finite-difference time-domain (HIE-FDTD) method is weakly conditionally stable, only determined by two space-discretizations, which is very useful for problems with fine structures in one direction. Its numerical dispersion errors with nonuniform cells are discussed and compared in this paper. To enlarge the applicable field of the HIE-FDTD method to open space, the absorbing boundary conditions (ABCs) for this method are also introduced and applied. Two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the update process, the electric field can be computed by a coefficient tridiagonal matrix. Mur absorbing boundary is applied to truncate the simulation space 21 . Different from the perfect‐electric‐conductor condition implementation, the absorption coefficients are added to the first and last rows of the tridiagonal matrix. []1Cmur()1italicCa()1italicCb()1italicCc()1italicCa()2italicCb()2italicCc()2italicCa()3italicCb()3italicCc()3italicCa()Nygoodbreak−1italicCb()Nygoodbreak−1italicCc()Nygoodbreak−1Cmur()21[]Exn+1()1Exn+1()2Exn+1()3Exn+1()4Exn+1()NyExn+1()Nygoodbreak+1goodbreak=[]rxn()1rxn()2rxn()3rxn()4rxn()Nyrxn()Nygoodbreak+1, where, italicCa()i…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the update process, the electric field can be computed by a coefficient tridiagonal matrix. Mur absorbing boundary is applied to truncate the simulation space 21 . Different from the perfect‐electric‐conductor condition implementation, the absorption coefficients are added to the first and last rows of the tridiagonal matrix. []1Cmur()1italicCa()1italicCb()1italicCc()1italicCa()2italicCb()2italicCc()2italicCa()3italicCb()3italicCc()3italicCa()Nygoodbreak−1italicCb()Nygoodbreak−1italicCc()Nygoodbreak−1Cmur()21[]Exn+1()1Exn+1()2Exn+1()3Exn+1()4Exn+1()NyExn+1()Nygoodbreak+1goodbreak=[]rxn()1rxn()2rxn()3rxn()4rxn()Nyrxn()Nygoodbreak+1, where, italicCa()i…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mur absorbing boundary is applied to truncate the simulation space. 21 Different from the perfect-electric-conductor condition implementation, the absorption coefficients are added to the first and last rows of the tridiagonal matrix.…”
Section: Basic Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voltages and currents induced at the terminal of the circuit by coupling of electromagnetic waves are obtained from the solution of the field quantities directly. With its advantages of simple algorithm and readily broadband analysis ability, the FDTD method is a good candidate among all the full-wave approaches [14][15][16][17]. FDTD method has been widely used to analyze interconnect structures especially in the solution of planar microwave circuits in the last two decades [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%