1991
DOI: 10.1137/0329006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of a Splitting Algorithm to Decomposition in Convex Programming and Variational Inequalities

Abstract: Recently Han and Lou [18] proposed a highly parallelizable decomposition algorithm for convex programming involving strongly convex costs. We show in this paper that their algorithm, as well as the method of multipliers [17,19,34] and the dual gradient method [8,40], are special cases of a certain multiplier method for separable convex programming. This multiplier method is similar to the alternating direction method of multipliers [10,15] but uses both Lagrangian and augmented Lagrangian functions. We also ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
337
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 410 publications
(341 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
337
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of authors, mainly in the French mathematical community, have extensively studied monotone operator splitting methods, which fall into four principal classes: forward-backward [40,13,56], double-backward [30,40], Peaceman-Rachford [31], and Douglas-Rachford [31]. For a survey, readers may wish to refer to [1 I,Chapter 3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors, mainly in the French mathematical community, have extensively studied monotone operator splitting methods, which fall into four principal classes: forward-backward [40,13,56], double-backward [30,40], Peaceman-Rachford [31], and Douglas-Rachford [31]. For a survey, readers may wish to refer to [1 I,Chapter 3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again it can be shown, see, e.g., (Lions and Mercier 1979;Combettes 2004;Combettes and Wajs 2005), that under the conditions stated in Theorem 2 below the operator T is averaged and convergence follows by Theorem 1. A somewhat different approach to the proof of the following theorem can be found in (Tseng 1991).…”
Section: Operator Splitting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the functional (23) is coercive there exists a minimizer. Further, F 2 is proper, convex and closed so that it remains by [24,25] to show that ∇F 1 is Lipschtz continuous with constant < 2/τ which is obviously the case if τ < 2/ ∆ 2 .…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%