14th WCCM-ECCOMAS Congress 2021
DOI: 10.23967/wccm-eccomas.2020.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of a Nodal-Integration-Based Finite Element Method to Non-Linearc Problems

Abstract: In this paper, we firstly introduce a nodal-integration-based finite element method. The method allows the use of first-order tetrahedral elements without suffering from the volumetric locking problem. The most important advantage of tetrahedral meshes is that they can be automatically generated for complex geometries using existing reliable meshing tools. The method is then applied to 3 types of applications. The first application is a large displacement, large strains elastic-plastic simulation on a notched … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the main focus of this paper is not on comparisons of CPU times and storage requirements in the classical FEM and Jia et al's [20] NIFEM-which have already been discussed by Jia et al [20,26]-some quick remarks on the subject may be welcome. The CPU time required by the NIFEM (be it without or with the procedure of Section 2 for free surface nodes) is approximately 2.7 times larger than that required by the classical FEM (5.37 h or 5.51 h versus 2.01 h)-most probably because of the increased bandwidth of the LHS matrix in the NIFEM.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the main focus of this paper is not on comparisons of CPU times and storage requirements in the classical FEM and Jia et al's [20] NIFEM-which have already been discussed by Jia et al [20,26]-some quick remarks on the subject may be welcome. The CPU time required by the NIFEM (be it without or with the procedure of Section 2 for free surface nodes) is approximately 2.7 times larger than that required by the classical FEM (5.37 h or 5.51 h versus 2.01 h)-most probably because of the increased bandwidth of the LHS matrix in the NIFEM.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%