1969
DOI: 10.13031/2013.38955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application Rates and Runoff in Center-Pivot Sprinkler Irrigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 is highly empirical, and the constants (k and n) have no physical interpretation, this function has been used to describe the infiltration under all types of irrigation systems including center-pivot systems (8). The Soil Conservation Service has classified soils into intake families using a modification of Eq.…”
Section: Rlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 is highly empirical, and the constants (k and n) have no physical interpretation, this function has been used to describe the infiltration under all types of irrigation systems including center-pivot systems (8). The Soil Conservation Service has classified soils into intake families using a modification of Eq.…”
Section: Rlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integral of the intake-function can be written as The first variable needed in the calculation of the modified intake rate is the time to surface saturation, t s . The procedure used to calculate t s is similar to that proposed by Kincaid, et al (8). The parameter t s is the time at which the modified intake function is equal to the application rate (Fig.…”
Section: Ar(t)dt Jomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal variations in the value of the application rate of water in central pivot are analyzed under the assumption that during the time interval corresponding to the time of wetting, the application rate of water follows a template elliptical (KINCAID et al, 1969;DILLON et al, 1972;GILLEY, 1984;BERNUTH & GILLEY, 1985). However, others believe that the parabolic profile (LUZ & HEERMANN, 2005) or the trapezoidal pattern (DEBOER et al, 2001;KINCAID, 2005) are more suitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these systems can achieve high efficiencies and uniformities when designed and managed properly. However, the efficiency and uniformity of these systems can be considerably reduced by runoff resulting from high application rates; unfortunately, runoff is inherent with moving sprinkler systems (Kincaid et al, 1969;Thooyamani et al, 1987;Kincaid, 2005;Luz, 2011). Moving systems are designed to apply water over a given point in the field within a set limited amount of time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%