2020
DOI: 10.17512/jamcm.2020.1.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of variation of the parameters method for micropolar flow in a porous channel

Abstract: This work devoted to study the injective micropolar flow in a porous channel. The flow is driven by suction or injection on the channel walls, and the micropolar model is used to characterize the working fluid. The governing nonlinear partial differential equations are reduced to the nonlinear ordinary coupled differential equations by using Berman's similarity transformation. These equations are solved for large mass transfer via variation of parameters method (VPM) which has been used effectively in the solu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in a table and several graphs illustrate the influence of the important dimensionless parameters such as N1,N2,N3 ${N}_{1},{N}_{2},{N}_{3}$, and Re $\text{Re}$ on the velocity profile and microrotation profile. To validate our findings, the results are compared with those reported by Güngör and Arslantürk 50 as presented in Tables 2 and 3 for different values of η $\eta $. In this case, an extremely motivating concurrence connecting the solutions is observed too, which confirms the outstanding strength of the HWM and DTM.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results presented in a table and several graphs illustrate the influence of the important dimensionless parameters such as N1,N2,N3 ${N}_{1},{N}_{2},{N}_{3}$, and Re $\text{Re}$ on the velocity profile and microrotation profile. To validate our findings, the results are compared with those reported by Güngör and Arslantürk 50 as presented in Tables 2 and 3 for different values of η $\eta $. In this case, an extremely motivating concurrence connecting the solutions is observed too, which confirms the outstanding strength of the HWM and DTM.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…u $u$ and v $v$ are the velocity component in the x $x$ and y $y$ directions, and N $N$ is microrotation, respectively. The relevant equations governing the flow are 50 xu+yv=0 ${\partial }_{x}u+{\partial }_{y}v=0$ ρL1u=xP+(μ+κ)L2u+κ.25emyN $\rho {L}_{1}u=-{\partial }_{x}P+(\mu +\kappa ){L}_{2}u+\kappa \,{\partial }_{y}N$ ρL1v=yP+(μ+κ)L2vκ.25emxN $\rho {L}_{1}v=-{\partial }_{y}P+(\mu +\kappa ){L}_{2}v-\kappa \,{\partial }_{x}N$ ρL1N=κj(2N+yuxv)+μsjL2N $\rho {L}_{1}N=-\frac{\kappa }{j}(2N+{\partial }_{y}u-{\partial }_{x}v)+\frac{{\mu }_{s}}{j}{L}_{2}N$where ρ $\rho $ is the fluid density, μ $\mu $ is the dynamic viscosity, …”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%