2021
DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2021.2004101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of ultrasound markers measured at different time points of COH cycle in the prediction of ovarian response for individualised ovulation induction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is widely used in IVF-ET to obtain a sufficient number of oocytes for downstream processing [130]. However, successful ovulation is accompanied by a rapid increase in OS levels and inflammatory response [131]; thus, whether COH can lead to ovarian OS damage has received widespread attention.…”
Section: Superovulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is widely used in IVF-ET to obtain a sufficient number of oocytes for downstream processing [130]. However, successful ovulation is accompanied by a rapid increase in OS levels and inflammatory response [131]; thus, whether COH can lead to ovarian OS damage has received widespread attention.…”
Section: Superovulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with a single uterine spiral artery, the uterine artery reflects the blood flow perfusion of the entire uterus, and the uterine artery S/D is not a commonly used measurement index to assess endometrial receptivity during IVF-ET and typically requires the assessment of uterine artery PI, RI, and other indicators for a comprehensive judgment, and measuring uterine artery PI and RI on IVF-ET days is more useful in determining whether the endometrium is in a state suitable for embryo adhesion and completion of implantation ( 31 ). The pooled results showed that the S/D of the pregnancy group after receiving IVF-ET were significantly lower than that of the non-pregnancy, while the difference between RI and PI in the pregnancy group and the non-pregnancy group after receiving IVF-ET was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%