2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.639-640.1025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Ultrasonic Testing in Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Arch Bridge

Abstract: Concrete Filled Steel Tube(CFST) is widely used in civil engineering structures because of its superior mechanical performance. Yet the mechanical behavior of CFST is highly depended on the construction quality of the filled concrete. Hence it is very important for the inspection of the construction quality of the filled concrete in CFST structures. In this paper, the ultrasonic testing technique was used to detect the defect of the filled concrete of a CFST arch bridge. During the inspection, the ultrasonic t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many nondestructive evaluation methods exist ranging from acoustics to optical, with most of them operating through measuring sound, light, intensity of electromagnetic field, temperature, or displacements . Many researchers have conducted damage identification studies based on nondestructive evaluation methods: the guided ultrasonic wave‐based method, the ground penetrating radar‐based method, the ultrasonic testing‐based method, the acoustic emission‐based method, thermography method, impact echo method, etc. The coupling of real‐time monitoring techniques (i.e., vibration‐based damage identification methods) and nondestructive evaluation methods may form a powerful tool for model updating and damage identification of large and complicated structures. It is recommended that vibration‐based damage identification methods are used to detect the approximate location of damage within a bridge, with nondestructive evaluation methods then used to localize the exact flaw location and evaluate the severity of the damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many nondestructive evaluation methods exist ranging from acoustics to optical, with most of them operating through measuring sound, light, intensity of electromagnetic field, temperature, or displacements . Many researchers have conducted damage identification studies based on nondestructive evaluation methods: the guided ultrasonic wave‐based method, the ground penetrating radar‐based method, the ultrasonic testing‐based method, the acoustic emission‐based method, thermography method, impact echo method, etc. The coupling of real‐time monitoring techniques (i.e., vibration‐based damage identification methods) and nondestructive evaluation methods may form a powerful tool for model updating and damage identification of large and complicated structures. It is recommended that vibration‐based damage identification methods are used to detect the approximate location of damage within a bridge, with nondestructive evaluation methods then used to localize the exact flaw location and evaluate the severity of the damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%