2017
DOI: 10.2298/apt1748085f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of two rheological methods for flour testing to predict pasta quality

Abstract: Two rheological methods were used for determining the quality of five different spelt flour samples as a raw material for pasta making. The measurements encompassed correlations between the mixolab and alveograph data and textural attributes for dry and cooked pasta, as well as pasta color. The flour denoted by 5 was scored as the most convenient raw material for pasta due to the following mixolab data: protein weakening (0.67±0.05), starch gelatinization (1.69±0.10), amylase activity (2.34±0.15), starch retro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact could be explained by the effect of sourdough and the sugar substrate that the yeasts had available in these BF fractions. The extensibility of dough (L), as a predictor of the processing characteristics of dough, also points out protease activity [56]. The influence of BF addition level and PS on dough extensibility could be based on the high contribution of this protein content and, therefore, a minor gluten formation, results which are in line with earlier reports [29].…”
Section: Alveograph Rheological Parameterssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This fact could be explained by the effect of sourdough and the sugar substrate that the yeasts had available in these BF fractions. The extensibility of dough (L), as a predictor of the processing characteristics of dough, also points out protease activity [56]. The influence of BF addition level and PS on dough extensibility could be based on the high contribution of this protein content and, therefore, a minor gluten formation, results which are in line with earlier reports [29].…”
Section: Alveograph Rheological Parameterssupporting
confidence: 86%