2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of two-component model of drainage discharge to nitrate contamination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Czech Republic, Bruthans (2006) investigated the mean retention time of water in karstic areas using environmental isotopes and other natural tracers. Buzek et al (1991, 2009) used 18 O and 3 H to distinguish runoff components and to establish the proportion of recent precipitation in the runoff. These methods require precise sampling and expensive laboratory analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Czech Republic, Bruthans (2006) investigated the mean retention time of water in karstic areas using environmental isotopes and other natural tracers. Buzek et al (1991, 2009) used 18 O and 3 H to distinguish runoff components and to establish the proportion of recent precipitation in the runoff. These methods require precise sampling and expensive laboratory analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean residence time of water in the UDL catchment (∼ 8.3 months) was shorter than in three previously studied catchments in the Czech Republic. Lysina (LYS) catchment in the western Czech Republic (elevation of 830-950 m) was characterized by a mean water residence time of 15.2 months (Buzek et al, 2009). Dehtare and Jenin catchments in the central Czech Republic (elevations of 500-640 and 640-880 m) had a mean water residence time of 12.5 and 9.3 months, respectively (Buzek et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behaviour of Na + vs. K + ions can also be interpreted as a decrease in water residence time from the slope to the valley. On this note, we followed the modelling approach implemented by Buzek et al (1995Buzek et al ( , 2009 to provide further insight into the mean residence time of soil solutions calculated across all sampling locations which was estimated in approximately 8.3 months (Appendix A). In consequence, the runoff water at UDL is a mixture of direct precipitation with older soil solutions admixed with even older shallow groundwater.…”
Section: Recovery From Acidification As Observed In the Spatial And Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lysina (LYS) catchment in the western Czech Republic (elevation of 830-950 m) was characterized by a mean water residence time of 15.2 months [48]. Dehtare and Jenin catchments in the central Czech Republic (elevations of 500-640 and 640-880 m) had a mean water residence time of 12.5 and 9.3 months, respectively [49]. A fourth small catchment located in a spruce die-back affected area near Jezeri (northwestern Czech Republic; elevation of 540-750 m) exhibited just slightly lower mean water residence time of 7.2 months than UDL [50].…”
Section: A 1 Hydraulic Insights From 18 O/ 16 O Isotope Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%