Application of three dimensional-printed devices in extraction technologies

Enhancing the Concentration Capability of Nonsupported Electrically Driven Liquid-Phase Microextraction through Programmable Flow Using an All-In-One 3D-Printed Optosensor: A Proof of Concept

“…Additionally, the elevated temperature generated during carving might pose deformational problems to the channels . Alignment difficulties and possible breakage of micromills might also jeopardize the ease of fabrication and device-to-device reproducibility. , As an appealing alternative, 3D-printing technology, a subset of additive manufacturing processes, has recently been embraced in analytical chemistry on account of the increasing availability of printable materials and the inherent capabilities for creating bespoke geometries and complex designs of modules, scaffolds, housing, and accessories. − In sample preparation applications, 3D-printing technology has been primarily utilized to fabricate platforms catering to solid-phase (micro)­extraction − and to a lesser extent to accommodating the various extraction modes of liquid-phase microextraction (LPME). , In fact, 3D-printing in LPME workflows, especially EME, has not yet been leveraged to its full potential to outperform standard protocols for fluidic supported membrane-based EME and nonsupported μ-EME approaches that are both characterized by rigid architectures.…”

“… 27 − 33 In sample preparation applications, 3D-printing technology has been primarily utilized to fabricate platforms catering to solid-phase (micro)extraction 34 − 36 and to a lesser extent to accommodating the various extraction modes of liquid-phase microextraction (LPME). 28 , 37 In fact, 3D-printing in LPME workflows, especially EME, has not yet been leveraged to its full potential to outperform standard protocols for fluidic supported membrane-based EME and nonsupported μ-EME approaches that are both characterized by rigid architectures.…”