2019
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2019.1618922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of thermal imaging and hyperspectral remote sensing for crop water deficit stress monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the full spectrum, the calibration model with sensitive bands selected by B+VIP had higher estimation accuracy and better stability. This indicated that variable selection could reduce model complexity and improve model performance due to the removal of irrelevant and interference variables (Krishna et al, 2019). The B-coefficient and VIP value of the PLSR model reflected the weight of variables in predicting PWC, and they can be used as the basis for band selection (Sharabian et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Approaches To Sensitive Band Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the full spectrum, the calibration model with sensitive bands selected by B+VIP had higher estimation accuracy and better stability. This indicated that variable selection could reduce model complexity and improve model performance due to the removal of irrelevant and interference variables (Krishna et al, 2019). The B-coefficient and VIP value of the PLSR model reflected the weight of variables in predicting PWC, and they can be used as the basis for band selection (Sharabian et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Approaches To Sensitive Band Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Xu, et al [21] used multispectral data derived from Landsat OLI and MODIS datasets to quantify crop water content with an optimal R 2 of 0.78. Additionally, Sibanda, Onisimo, Dube and Mabhaudhi [20] utilised Sentinel-2 MSI to estimate canopy water content using EWT and FMC to an rRMSE of 20.8% and 18.45%, respectively, while Krishna, et al [22] used the combination of hyperspectral sensors and partial least squares regression to estimate rice crop water stress with an R 2 of 0.94. However, despite these successes, the application of satellite data in characterising water indicators at farm scale is restricted by their relatively coarser spatial and temporal resolutions [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seasonally, it is important to detect episodic drought early enough to deploy irrigation and alleviate crop drought stress before actual yield losses occur [9]. Drought stress early in the season when the crop is juvenile typically results in reduced leaf area and light interception [10], which also reduces the maximum stomatal conductance (g s ) of the newly developed leaves [5,7], leading to reduced photosynthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%