2015
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxv030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the Vertex Exchange Method to estimate a semi-parametric mixture model for the MIC density ofEscherichia coliisolates tested for susceptibility against ampicillin

Abstract: In the last decades, considerable attention has been paid to the collection of antimicrobial resistance data, with the aim of monitoring non-wild-type isolates. This monitoring is performed based on minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) values, which are collected through dilution experiments. We present a semi-parametric mixture model to estimate the entire MIC density on the continuous scale. The parametric first component is extended with a non-parametric second component and a new back-fitting algorithm, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a univariate setting, while using the mixtures to model the MIC distribution (e.g. Jaspers et al., ), the wild‐type subpopulation of microbials was characterized by the mixture component with the lowest mean value. In a multivariate setting, with K mixture means μk=false(μk,1,0.16em,0.16emμk,qfalse), k=1,,K, it is however not always possible to identify a single component g{1,,K} for which all marginal means μg,j, j=1,,q, attain their minimal value across the subpopulations.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a univariate setting, while using the mixtures to model the MIC distribution (e.g. Jaspers et al., ), the wild‐type subpopulation of microbials was characterized by the mixture component with the lowest mean value. In a multivariate setting, with K mixture means μk=false(μk,1,0.16em,0.16emμk,qfalse), k=1,,K, it is however not always possible to identify a single component g{1,,K} for which all marginal means μg,j, j=1,,q, attain their minimal value across the subpopulations.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, we require two extensions to the existing methodology, that is we need (E1)a procedure that is able to cope with covariate‐dependent mixing weights of the mixture and (E2)a procedure that is able to estimate the joint (multivariate) MIC density of two or more antimicrobials. Especially the extension into the multivariate setting is not straightforward for the univariate semiparametric approaches of Jaspers et al. (, , , ) mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the absence of a golden standard, we decided to compare between three existing methods. The adjusted CLM approach is compared to the back-fitting algorithm and to the two-stage penalized mixture (PM) approach presented in Jaspers et al (2014bJaspers et al ( , 2016, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there seemed to be some kind of discontinuity in the region of overlap between the first and second component, resulting from the used two-stage approach. These drawbacks were circumvented by the back-fitting algorithm presented in Jaspers et al (2016). In their paper, the authors proposed a likelihood based method for the estimation of both the wild-type and nonwild-type component.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%