1948
DOI: 10.2307/2280277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the Theory of Extreme Values in Fracture Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

1954
1954
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The generation of trueF¯V(σ) from F¯(σ) is based on the independence of the fundamental volume elements and is consistent with “weakest-link” arguments, in which a chain (component) is only as strong as its weakest link (element) (if the links are independent, the strength of the chain is not altered by the presence or absence of links that are stronger than the weakest link.) Independence and weakest link ideas were used by Weibull and Epstein in early considerations of strength variability [36-39], consistent with dilute or “isolated” populations of flaws (i.e., c << Δ V 1/3 ) and the absence of “non-local” effects in brittle fracture strengths [32, 40, 41]. The cdf of a strength distribution is complementary to the ccdf, and thus the cdf for the group of component strengths, F V ( σ ), is given by FV(σ)=1trueF¯V(σ)=1F¯(σfalse)k…”
Section: Fracture Probability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generation of trueF¯V(σ) from F¯(σ) is based on the independence of the fundamental volume elements and is consistent with “weakest-link” arguments, in which a chain (component) is only as strong as its weakest link (element) (if the links are independent, the strength of the chain is not altered by the presence or absence of links that are stronger than the weakest link.) Independence and weakest link ideas were used by Weibull and Epstein in early considerations of strength variability [36-39], consistent with dilute or “isolated” populations of flaws (i.e., c << Δ V 1/3 ) and the absence of “non-local” effects in brittle fracture strengths [32, 40, 41]. The cdf of a strength distribution is complementary to the ccdf, and thus the cdf for the group of component strengths, F V ( σ ), is given by FV(σ)=1trueF¯V(σ)=1F¯(σfalse)k…”
Section: Fracture Probability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic physical idea is to treat failure as revealing the weakest microstructural feature of the system. Starting with da Vinci's early efforts to quantify the strength of ropes (26), followed by Mariotte's more quantitative work (27), fracture became a popular application of extreme value statistics (e.g., see 28,29). Describing the overall statistics of the results of mechanical testing does not, however, expose the underlying connection to a material's microstructure or to the still more fundamental behavior of large populations of dislocations.…”
Section: Weakest Microstructural Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An asymptotic development allows expressing r into z [41][42][43] r ¼ m À s ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi 2 ln i p À ln ln i þ ln 4p…”
Section: Example Iii: Brittle Strength Homogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%