2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-011-9839-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the Regional Flood Frequency Analysis to the Upper and Lower Basins of the Indus River, Pakistan

Abstract: The paper presents results of an application of the L-moments based regional flood frequency analysis to annual maximum peak (AMP) flows observed at seven stations (Tarbela, Kalabagh, Chashma, Taunsa, Guddu, Sukkur and Kotri) located on the main stream of the Indus River, Pakistan. The results of Run-test and lag-1 correlation coefficient showed that the data series at given sites is random and has no serious serial correlations respectively. Furthermore, the results of Grubbs and Beck test illustrated that th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IFM is commonly used to develop regional flood frequency models for ungauged or gauged sites where there is insufficient hydrological information to reliably estimate extreme events (Cunane 1987;Watt et al, 1989;Portela and Dias, 2005;Saf, 2009;Nyeko-Ogiramoi et al, 2012;Ellouze and Abida, 2008). Worldwide application of the L-moments method with the IFM in regionalisation studies of maximum flow rates has yielded very satisfactory results (Vogel and Fennessey, 1993;Madsen et al, 1997;Lim and Lye, 2003;Ferro and Porto, 2006;Ellouze and Abida, 2008;Saf, 2009;Mishra et al, 2009;Hussain, 2011). This is called an index-flood approach to regional frequency analysis (Dalrymple, 1960).…”
Section: Best Fit Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IFM is commonly used to develop regional flood frequency models for ungauged or gauged sites where there is insufficient hydrological information to reliably estimate extreme events (Cunane 1987;Watt et al, 1989;Portela and Dias, 2005;Saf, 2009;Nyeko-Ogiramoi et al, 2012;Ellouze and Abida, 2008). Worldwide application of the L-moments method with the IFM in regionalisation studies of maximum flow rates has yielded very satisfactory results (Vogel and Fennessey, 1993;Madsen et al, 1997;Lim and Lye, 2003;Ferro and Porto, 2006;Ellouze and Abida, 2008;Saf, 2009;Mishra et al, 2009;Hussain, 2011). This is called an index-flood approach to regional frequency analysis (Dalrymple, 1960).…”
Section: Best Fit Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cunnane (1998) suggested using the station-year method, whereas Sveinsson et al (2001) proposed the population index flood method. The method introduced by Hosking and Wallis (1993) appears to display more acceptability in RFFA; its application can be found in Lim (2007), Saf (2009), Notto and Loggia (2009), Hussain (2011), and Rostami (2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have been conducted at various scales for basins with areas greater than several thousand square kilometre, e.g. the studies in the Wabash basin (Rao and Hamed, 1997) and the Montana area (Parrett, 1998) in the USA, in the Mahi-Sabarmati basin (Parida et al, 1998), in KwaZulu-Natal area in South Africa (Kjeldsen et al, 2002), in Sarawak basin of Malaysia (Lim and Lye, 2003), in the North-Bank of river Brahmaputra of India (Bhuyan et al, 2010), in the northern North Atlantic region (Kingston et al, 2011), in the Indus River basin of Pakistan (Hussain, 2011), in the West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia (Zakaria et al, 2012), in the Sicily island of Italy (Gabriele and Chiaravalloti, 2013) and in the Sefidroud basin of Iran (Dodangeh et al, 2014). Studies at country-scale with areas reaching 10 million km 2 have also been described and include, for example, Australia (Pearson et al, 1991), Canada (Adamowski et al, 1996), Israel (Ben-Zvi and Azmon, 1997), southern Africa (Mkhandi et al, 2000), Turkey (Seckin et al, 2011) and Selangor (Zakaria and Shabri, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%