2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the PROMETHEE technique to determine depression outlet location and flow direction in DEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the goal of this study is selection of de-desertification optimal alternatives on the basis of a set of effective criteria, PROMETHEE II, with the ability of separated alternatives complete ranking, has been used (Chou et al, 2004). This method is effective and compatible in where numerous alternatives should be assessed based on quantitatively, qualitatively and often contradictory criteria (Albadavi et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the goal of this study is selection of de-desertification optimal alternatives on the basis of a set of effective criteria, PROMETHEE II, with the ability of separated alternatives complete ranking, has been used (Chou et al, 2004). This method is effective and compatible in where numerous alternatives should be assessed based on quantitatively, qualitatively and often contradictory criteria (Albadavi et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the goal of this study, due to the limitation of inputs, is assessment of de-desertification alternatives in order to achieve the optimal alternatives in the context of sustainable management of desert area. In order to achieve this goal in the context of Multiple Attribute Decision Making models, Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) that is one of the most important (Chou et al, 2004) and understandable (Pomerol and Romero, 2000) methods of Multiple Attribute Decision Making for ranking of dedesertification alternatives, was considered. Facility, clarity and stability of results are some of advantages of PROMETHEE method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption that there is no interdependence among the sub-criteria should be firmly emphasised in determining the prospective upper-level criterion. AHP incorporates the evaluations of all the decision-makers into a final decision (Javalgi, Armacost & Husseini, 1989;Forman & Peniwati, 1998;Chou, Lin, Lin, Chou & Huang, 2004;Chang, Wu, Lin & Chen, 2007;Wu, Shih & Chan, 2008), without having to elicit their utility functions on subjective and objective criteria by pair-wise comparisons of the alternatives (Saaty, 1990;Lipovetsky, 1996;Saaty, 2000;Altuzarra, Maria, Jimenez & Salvador, 2007). The AHP framework is constructed in the form of a matrix, and a local priority vector may be derived as an estimate of relative importance associated with the elements (or components) under comparison by solving the following equations:…”
Section: Determining the Weights Of Criteria Using Ahpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods put forward hypotheses on how to maintain hydrologic connectivity by interpreting the DEM elevations without enforcing modification of the original DEM (e.g. Chorowicz et al, 1992;Chou et al, 2004). The FDIR assignment is also characterized by an extensive literature.…”
Section: Terrain Analysis For Dem Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%