1996
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)01453-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the pinch technique to neutral current amplitudes and the concept of the Z mass

Abstract: The pinch technique (PT) is applied to neutral current amplitudes, focusing on the mixing problem. Extending recent arguments due to Papavassiliou and Pilaftsis, it is shown that the use of the PT self-energies does not shift the complex-valued position of the pole through order O(g 4 ). This leads (to the same accuracy) to a simple interpretation of M Z , the mass measured at LEP, in terms of the PT self-energies. It is pointed out that the PT approach provides a convenient and rather elegant formalism to dis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case we can set ImA ′′ (M 2 ) = 0 in Eq. (14). For ImA(M 2 ) we again employ the unitarity relation (Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case we can set ImA ′′ (M 2 ) = 0 in Eq. (14). For ImA(M 2 ) we again employ the unitarity relation (Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11]. Recently, there has been significant progress in the construction of the PT selfenergies in higher orders [12,13,14]. In the expansion analogous to Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The explicit construction of R ZZ 2 (s) in the ξ i = 1 gauges has been given in Ref. [5]. We must now generalize this procedure to a general gauge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As explained in Refs. [5], [6], using the scaling approximation for One can readily carry out the same analysis for the W self-energy . In this case there are no mixing complications but the R ξ gauge dependence is governed by three parameters…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%