1982
DOI: 10.1021/j100214a029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the photoinduced electron transfer model to the hydrated-electron spectrum

Abstract: ferric porphyrins is very similar to that of CC13 radicals.5 Both CC14 and CF3CHClBr are known to be bound by ferric cytochrome P-450.39 The reduction of the hemoprotein via its enzymic chain is thus believed to induce a reaction sequence starting with reaction 1. As both CC13 and CF3CHCI are not expected to be quickly scavenged by the ferric cytochrome P-450, they have a chance to react with the surrounding medium. Thus, in agreement with recent results,40 one-electron-transfer reactions are believed to have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to contemplate whether this realization would have made a difference in the long-running debate concerning the “cavity” vs “solvent anion” nature of hydrated electrons, if the correct extinction coefficient had been reported in the 1960s. Virtually every model of solvated electron which has ever been presented was justified by its ability to reproduce the optical absorption spectrum, ,,,,, but a cavity model, or a modern single electron/pseudopotential model, clearly cannot produce oscillator strength greater than unity. The result reinforces the arguments recently presented by Shkrob and co-workers on the basis of the magnetic resonance evidence, , that all solvated electrons, even in water, should really be viewed as multimer-solvent anions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to contemplate whether this realization would have made a difference in the long-running debate concerning the “cavity” vs “solvent anion” nature of hydrated electrons, if the correct extinction coefficient had been reported in the 1960s. Virtually every model of solvated electron which has ever been presented was justified by its ability to reproduce the optical absorption spectrum, ,,,,, but a cavity model, or a modern single electron/pseudopotential model, clearly cannot produce oscillator strength greater than unity. The result reinforces the arguments recently presented by Shkrob and co-workers on the basis of the magnetic resonance evidence, , that all solvated electrons, even in water, should really be viewed as multimer-solvent anions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%