1992
DOI: 10.1109/36.175329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the multiple PRF technique to resolve Doppler centroid estimation ambiguity for spaceborne SAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frame 1 in Figure 3 is a subimage for the comparison between a conventional SAR image and the corresponding estimated NRCS image. The first step is estimating the Doppler centroid f0 for each range cell [11,[15][16][17][18][19], and then shifting the Doppler spectrum centroid of the single-look complex image to zero. Note that ocean currents can lead to an additional local shift of the Doppler centroid [20][21][22].…”
Section: Example 1: Qualitative Analysis For the Estimation Methods Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frame 1 in Figure 3 is a subimage for the comparison between a conventional SAR image and the corresponding estimated NRCS image. The first step is estimating the Doppler centroid f0 for each range cell [11,[15][16][17][18][19], and then shifting the Doppler spectrum centroid of the single-look complex image to zero. Note that ocean currents can lead to an additional local shift of the Doppler centroid [20][21][22].…”
Section: Example 1: Qualitative Analysis For the Estimation Methods Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In solving for the Doppler ambiguity number, several algorithms have been used, such as the look displacement [2], multiple PRF [3], wavelength diversity (WDA) [4], multilook cross correlation (MLCC) [5], and multilook beat frequency (MLBF) algorithms [5]. However, the accuracy and robustness of the Doppler ambiguity number estimate still need improvement to satisfy current high-quality SAR processing requirements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the mentioned three algorithms, WDA and MLCC are suitable for low-contrast scene, and MLBF is propitious to high-contrast scene. Multiple PRF [4][5][6] avoids Doppler ambiguity based on a set of PRFs, whose disadvantages lie in the complexity of system design. Therefore, this method is employed mostly in ScanSAR mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%