2016
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2016.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the LBM with adaptive grid on water hammer simulation

Abstract: A lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is utilized to solve single-phase transient flow in pipes. In order to eliminate grid limitation related to the method of characteristics, governing equations are modified using appropriate coordinate transformation. The introduced modification removes connection between Courant number and spatial disposition of the computational nodes, forming a more flexible and robust mathematical base for numerical simulations. The computational grid is configured independently of the wave … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LBM was considered by Cheng et al [117] for unsteady flow, and later a practical and simple implementation was carried out by Wu et al [118]. Budinski [119] modelled a one-dimensional water hammer using the LBM, in which the grid was independent of the Courant number. To achieve this, the governing equations were transformed using an alternative coordinate system suitable for an adaptive grid.…”
Section: Lagrangian-based Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LBM was considered by Cheng et al [117] for unsteady flow, and later a practical and simple implementation was carried out by Wu et al [118]. Budinski [119] modelled a one-dimensional water hammer using the LBM, in which the grid was independent of the Courant number. To achieve this, the governing equations were transformed using an alternative coordinate system suitable for an adaptive grid.…”
Section: Lagrangian-based Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LBM provides an alternative approach for the fluid simulation besides the traditional finite element analysis methods. Because of its clear physical process and easy calculation, it has been widely used in complex fluid simulations (Fu et al , 2016; Kruggel-Emden et al , 2016; He and Tang, 2016; Lai and Ma, 2010; Budinski, 2016; Tang et al , 2016), even in the non-Newtonian fluids, and in non-Newtonian flow simulation, the relaxation time changes along with the local viscosity. It is well known that the stability and accuracy would be better when keeping the relaxation time in the range of 0.5 to 1 (Niu et al , 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%