Comparative methods of polarographic analysis consist essentially of comparing the heights of waves obtained for the substances to be determined with those found for solutions of known composition. By the absolute method, the concentration of an electrolyzable ion is correlated with its diffusion current and the characteristics of the dropping-mercury electrode employed. The advantages and limitations of several methods of these two types are dis-HE polarographic method of chemical analysis owes its in-T ception and early development to Heyrovskg and his 'students at Prague, who studied the behavior during electrolysis at the dropping-mercury electrode of a number of cations, an-~Q M , and nonelectrolytes in many kinds of media. As a result of these studies it was shown that the half-wave potential is charaoferistic of a given ion in a given supporting electrolyte, while the height of the step or wave on the current-voltage curve is, for a given electrode, directly proportional to the concen-tration of the reducible material.All the early work made use of the polarograph as an interpolative device in that the determination depended upon the comparison of the heights of the waves found for standard and unknown solutions. The discovery by Kemula (9) that the height of a wave is influenced by the rate of flow of mercury from the dropping electrode led IlkoviO (8) to develop a theoretical expression id = knDl/2Cm2/3t1/6 for the relation of the limiting current, id, to the mass of mercury, m, emitted from the capillary in unit time, the drop time, t, of the electrode, the diffusion coefficient, D, and the concentration,