1990
DOI: 10.1021/ac00204a013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the hollow cathode discharge emission source to the determination of nonmetals in microsamples

Abstract: The use of the hollow cathode discharge source for the excitation of nonmetals In volume-limited samples is discussed. The effects of breakdown voltage, fill-gas composition, electrode composition, hollow size, sample deposition mode, current, and fill-gas pressure on the emission signal from phosphorus and chlorine are reported. Instrumentation, operation, and sample preparation procedures are described. Temporal profiles of the emission signal from very small samples deposited in the hollow are given for P, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an alternative, a number of researchers used GD devices for indirect analysis of liquid samples by the sputter atomization of solution residues. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] The solution under investigation (1-100 ml) is placed on a planar cathode or inside the hollow cathode surface and dried directly or by infrared heating. This procedure can be applied in atomic absorption, 24,25 emission, 26,27 fluorescence, 28 resonance-ionization spectroscopy, 29 or mass spectrometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an alternative, a number of researchers used GD devices for indirect analysis of liquid samples by the sputter atomization of solution residues. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] The solution under investigation (1-100 ml) is placed on a planar cathode or inside the hollow cathode surface and dried directly or by infrared heating. This procedure can be applied in atomic absorption, 24,25 emission, 26,27 fluorescence, 28 resonance-ionization spectroscopy, 29 or mass spectrometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27][28][29][30] The solution under investigation (1-100 ml) is placed on a planar cathode or inside the hollow cathode surface and dried directly or by infrared heating. This procedure can be applied in atomic absorption, 24,25 emission, 26,27 fluorescence, 28 resonance-ionization spectroscopy, 29 or mass spectrometry. 30,31 In the case of solution analysis, however, the presence of water in ''dry residue'' may lead to essential deterioration of the analytical signal, especially in mass spectrometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of glow discharge devices for indirect analysis of solution samples by the sputter atomization of solution residues has been investigated by several researchers. 13±19 In these applications, dried residues from liquid samples are changed into the gas phase using cathodic sputtering, with the atomic population sampled by atomic absorption, 13,14 emission, 15,16 ¯uorescence, 17 or mass spectrometries. 18,19 Although this fairly simple method is capable of giving impressive levels of detection, the processes of sample deposition and solvent evaporation can be labor intensive and time consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the glow discharge has been developed and proven as a powerful spectrochemical source for various solid samples, the analysis of liquid samples has found only limited interest. A few publications have reported the use of hollow cathode glow discharges to sputter atomize solution residues. , In these applications, an aliquot (<200 μL) of the liquid sample is placed in the base of the hollow cathode, dried to a solid (residue) by direct or IR heating, and converted into gas-phase atoms through cathodic sputtering. Very impressive levels of detectability have been achieved by hollow cathode atomic emission spectrometry (HC-AES), with Chen and Williams 4 reporting limits of detection of 9 and 20 pg of P and Cl, respectively, in renal fluids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%