1966
DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(66)90103-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the evoked response technique in air pollution toxicology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study demonstrated that exposure of conscious rats to 0.5 and 1.0 ppm O3 produces marked decreases in HR, decreases in W with concomitant increases in SWS, sustained suppression of PS and decreases in powers of high frequency bands (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) Figure 5. Effects of atropine on HR (top), amounts of W, SWS and PS (middle) and power values of the parietal EEG spectra (bottom).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study demonstrated that exposure of conscious rats to 0.5 and 1.0 ppm O3 produces marked decreases in HR, decreases in W with concomitant increases in SWS, sustained suppression of PS and decreases in powers of high frequency bands (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) Figure 5. Effects of atropine on HR (top), amounts of W, SWS and PS (middle) and power values of the parietal EEG spectra (bottom).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work from our laboratory indicated that the evoked response may be a sensitive and reliable measure of the effect of exposure to carbon monoxide and ozone. 1 Despite frequent disagreement regarding the origin and meaning of evoked potentials, it is generally agreed that different neural elements sequentially activated will be reflected in the sequential appearance of various components of the waveform of the evoked potential. Stated differently, it is assumed that different phases of the evoked response arise as a result of the different pathways along which the afferent impulse enters the cerebral cortex or other subcortical receiving area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%