2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the eigenstrain approach to predict the residual stress distribution in laser shock peened AA7050-T7451 samples

Abstract: Laser Shock Peening allows the introduction of deep compressive residual stresses into metallic components. It is applicable to most metal alloys used for aerospace applications. The method is relatively expensive in application, and therefore development studies often rely heavily on Finite Element Modelling to simulate the entire process, with a high computational cost. A different approach has been used recently, the so-called eigenstrain approach. The present study looks at the feasibility of applying the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that relatively simple geometries (such as plates and blocks), where there is no significant change between the samples studied, were used in . Coratella et al further validated this transferability from a flat, planar surface to curved surfaces. However, in more complex geometries (such as the notched geometry with high stress concentration studied here), this may be less reasonable because the eigenstrain distribution introduced by the peening process is likely to be affected by changes in the component geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It is noteworthy that relatively simple geometries (such as plates and blocks), where there is no significant change between the samples studied, were used in . Coratella et al further validated this transferability from a flat, planar surface to curved surfaces. However, in more complex geometries (such as the notched geometry with high stress concentration studied here), this may be less reasonable because the eigenstrain distribution introduced by the peening process is likely to be affected by changes in the component geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In that work, a simplified eigenstrain field was determined from limited residual stress measurement data, and finite element models where used to determine the full residual stress field from the eigenstrain. Coratella et al [9] provide a recent validation of that earlier work in aerospace aluminum alloy (7050-T7451) samples with residual stresses from laser shock peening (LSP). Luckhood, Jun, and Korsunsky [10] have used the eigenstrain method to analyze residual stresses measured in friction stir welds.…”
Section: The Eigenstrain Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Figure 11 shows the yy component of stress separated using Eq. (9). The stress from eigenstrain σ* is zero outside the central square area, and constant inside it, due to the discontinuous behavior of the eigenstrain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the limitations of the method is that a full 2D stress map can be obtained for one stress direction only. However, by employing additional approaches such as application of the eigenstrain theory [7][8][9], multiple cuts, [10,11] and/or the superposition principle [12,13], multiple stress components can be obtained. Another limitation of the method is that near-surface residual stresses are challenging to obtain owing to cutting and measurement artefacts [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%