2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03617-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the coupled TOPSIS–Mahalanobis distance for multi-hazard-based management of the target districts of the Golestan Province, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the flood, six towns and about 70 villages along the river were affected. Also, rainfall reached 500 mm at some stations reached, which means more than 75% of annual rainfall occurred in 24 h (Sheikh et al, 2019). The depth of the water reached over 50 cm both in and outside of the city, the landslide caused rock falling from the mountain and block some of the roads.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the flood, six towns and about 70 villages along the river were affected. Also, rainfall reached 500 mm at some stations reached, which means more than 75% of annual rainfall occurred in 24 h (Sheikh et al, 2019). The depth of the water reached over 50 cm both in and outside of the city, the landslide caused rock falling from the mountain and block some of the roads.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean annual temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation are 14.16°C, 68.19%, and 597.13 mm, respectively. Despite considerable forest areas and relatively high precipitation, this watershed experiences frequent flooding events and a high rate of land degradation and sediment load (Sheikh et al, 2019). It is believed that land use planning and optimization can alleviate these threats.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It worked with similarity indexes of hazard maps and showed multi-hazard assessment. In Sheikh et al [47], TOPSIS-Mahalanobis distance, TOPSIS, and simple additive weight (SAW) methods were combined. Although the TOPSIS method was criticized for using only a geometric distance, it was mentioned that it gives more clear results for natural hazards.…”
Section: Background On Multi-hazard Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%