1995
DOI: 10.1016/0003-682x(95)00026-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the CEN draft building acoustics prediction model to a lightweight double leaf construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for the case of lightweight structures it may be important to use two different values depending on the radiation side. This is suggested in [3,4] and corroborated here on the basis of a numerical simulation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for the case of lightweight structures it may be important to use two different values depending on the radiation side. This is suggested in [3,4] and corroborated here on the basis of a numerical simulation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This regulation applies to heavy structures, not to lightweight structures. However, [3] and [4] suggest that the extension of EN12354 to lightweight structures should rely on the use of adequate values of the radiation efficiency. The results presented here illustrate that the radiation efficiency can be different for the two faces of an asymmetrical structure.…”
Section: The Role Of Beams In the Radiation Of A Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…vibration transmission from a floor to each of the parts of a double wall can be different) or radiation efficiencies can be different depending on the shape in each side of a wall [31,32]. Other aspects that are important to adapt current techniques and regulations for lightweight constructions are discussed in [33,34,11,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reciprocity between the calculated flanking transmission loss terms in each direction was used to exclude the radiation efficiency terms from the calculations such that [5]: (3) where is the estimation of the measurand according to EN12354-1. Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) was written under the assumption that , even for lightweight building elements [6] which may have critical frequencies above the frequency range of interest. Other authors [5,7] have suggested that the assumption of reciprocity may be acceptable for the heavy monolithic constructions for which EN12354-1 was intended, but may not be applicable to lightweight building constructions. The possible lack of reciprocity for lightweight structures is due in part to the vibration transmission factors which may differ significantly in each transmission direction for lightweight building elements [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%