2021
DOI: 10.3390/land10101056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the Adapted Approach for Crop Management Factor to Assess Soil Erosion Risk in an Agricultural Area of Rwanda

Abstract: Land use and land cover (LULC) management influences the severity of soil erosion risk. However, crop management (C) is one factor of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) model that should be taken into account in its determination, as it influences soil loss rate estimations. Thus, the present study applied an adapted C-factor estimation approach (CvkA) modified from the former approach (Cvk) to assess the impact of LULC dynamics on soil erosion risk in an agricultural area of Rwanda taking the we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The P factor is characterized as the cumulative soil loss following erosion control practices to soil loss after conservation practices [49,98], which are critical mechanisms in reducing the soil loss caused by runoff velocity and concentration, drainage patterns, and hydraulic drives on the soil surface [4,97]. The P factor value ranges from zero to one, with zero showing fields with effective conservation practices and one implying areas with little or no effective conservation practices [57].…”
Section: Support Practice (P) Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P factor is characterized as the cumulative soil loss following erosion control practices to soil loss after conservation practices [49,98], which are critical mechanisms in reducing the soil loss caused by runoff velocity and concentration, drainage patterns, and hydraulic drives on the soil surface [4,97]. The P factor value ranges from zero to one, with zero showing fields with effective conservation practices and one implying areas with little or no effective conservation practices [57].…”
Section: Support Practice (P) Factormentioning
confidence: 99%