Abstract:Tendon injuries like tendinopathy are a serious healthcare problem in the
United States. However, current treatments for tendon injuries are largely
palliative. Biologics treatments, including tendon stem/progenitor cells (TSCs)
and platelet rich plasma (PRP) hold great potential to effectively treat tendon
injuries. TSCs are tendon specific stem cells and have the ability to
differentiate into tenocytes, the resident tendon cells responsible for tendon
homeostasis and tendon repair in case of an injury. TSCs … Show more
“…Collectively, these two stem cell types have been differentiated into almost every connective tissue lineage, including bone, cartilage, tendon, and the intervertebral disk . More recently, cells with self‐renewal capacity, clonogenicity, and multilineage potential have been isolated from tendon tissue . In the original characterization of these tendon stem/progenitor cells (TSPCs), it was suggested that these cells may reside within the tendon proper and comprise a subpopulation of tenocytes .…”
Section: Stem Cell‐based Therapies For Rotator Cuff Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[97][98][99][100][101] More recently, cells with self-renewal capacity, clonogenicity, and multilineage potential have been isolated from tendon tissue. [102][103][104][105][106] In the original characterization of these tendon stem/progenitor cells (TSPCs), it was suggested that these cells may reside within the tendon proper and comprise a subpopulation of tenocytes. 102 Other studies, however, suggest that TSPCs may be located within the epitenon, which is the thin epithelial layer surrounding all tendons.…”
Section: Stem Cell-based Therapies For Rotator Cuff Repairmentioning
The rotator cuff is composed of several distinct muscles and tendons that function in concert to coordinate shoulder motion. Injuries to these tendons frequently result in permanent dysfunction and persistent pain. Despite considerable advances in operation techniques, surgical repair alone still does not fully restore rotator cuff function. This review focuses on recent research in the use of biologics and stem cell-based therapies to augment repair, highlighting promising avenues for future work and remaining challenges. While a number of animal models are used for rotator cuff studies, the anatomy of the rotator cuff varies dramatically between species. Since the rodent rotator cuff shares the most anatomical features with the human, this review will focus primarily on rodent models to enable consistent interpretation of outcome measures.
“…Collectively, these two stem cell types have been differentiated into almost every connective tissue lineage, including bone, cartilage, tendon, and the intervertebral disk . More recently, cells with self‐renewal capacity, clonogenicity, and multilineage potential have been isolated from tendon tissue . In the original characterization of these tendon stem/progenitor cells (TSPCs), it was suggested that these cells may reside within the tendon proper and comprise a subpopulation of tenocytes .…”
Section: Stem Cell‐based Therapies For Rotator Cuff Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[97][98][99][100][101] More recently, cells with self-renewal capacity, clonogenicity, and multilineage potential have been isolated from tendon tissue. [102][103][104][105][106] In the original characterization of these tendon stem/progenitor cells (TSPCs), it was suggested that these cells may reside within the tendon proper and comprise a subpopulation of tenocytes. 102 Other studies, however, suggest that TSPCs may be located within the epitenon, which is the thin epithelial layer surrounding all tendons.…”
Section: Stem Cell-based Therapies For Rotator Cuff Repairmentioning
The rotator cuff is composed of several distinct muscles and tendons that function in concert to coordinate shoulder motion. Injuries to these tendons frequently result in permanent dysfunction and persistent pain. Despite considerable advances in operation techniques, surgical repair alone still does not fully restore rotator cuff function. This review focuses on recent research in the use of biologics and stem cell-based therapies to augment repair, highlighting promising avenues for future work and remaining challenges. While a number of animal models are used for rotator cuff studies, the anatomy of the rotator cuff varies dramatically between species. Since the rodent rotator cuff shares the most anatomical features with the human, this review will focus primarily on rodent models to enable consistent interpretation of outcome measures.
“…8.3) [59]. Clinical trials have studied the effects of PRP injection as a primary treatment or augmentation of current therapies for patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinosis, and lateral epicondylitis [60].…”
Section: Tendinopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSCs hold promise in the use of tendinopathy [60]. As ongoing and future research advances our understanding of tendinopathy basic science, the role of angiogenesis in tendon healing, and the link between histology and clinical findings, the use of MSCs will likely continue to play an increasing role in treatment of this common yet often recalcitrant pathology.…”
“…This therapy is widely experimented in different fields of medicine to test its potential role to enhance tissue re-generation [13][14][15][16][17]. In a recent non-controlled prospective trial, the safety, toler -Fig 1. a) Free-hand technique with US probe placed parallel to the femur neck; b) sagittal US showing synovium/capsule (long arrow), the needle situated in the articulation (three short arrows), and the femoral head (H); c) PRP ultrasound-guided IA injections ability and efficacy of PRP IA injections have been the subject of a preliminary report on 40 hip OA patients at 7 weeks' and 6 months' follow-up [18].…”
viscosupplementation (hyaluronic acid [HA]) in hip osteoarthritis. Material and methods: A total of 43 patients affected by monolateral severe hip osteoarthritis (OA) were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive either intra-articular PRP (3 ml) or HA (30 mg/2 ml; 1,000-2,900 kDa), 3 injections in total – 1/week. Clinical assessments for each patient were made at baseline (T0), 4 (T1), and 16 weeks (T2) of follow-up. The primary efficacy outcome was pain reduction as measured by VAS and by WOMAC pain subscale. Results: Data analysis revealed that, compared to T0, in the PRP-treated group VAS scores significantly decreased at T1 but not at T2, thereby indicating an early effect on pain which was not maintained at a longer term follow-up. In the HA group a significant decrease of both VAS and WOMAC values was registered only between T0 and T2. Conclusions: Intra-articular PRP had an immediate effect on pain that was not maintained at longer term follow-up when, on the contrary, the effects of intra-articular HA were evident.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.