Application of Temporary Splints

Knecht, Charles D.

doi:10.1016/s0091-0279(75)50028-6

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Fraktureigenschaften1

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Year Published

1996

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Alle Frakturen sollten zur Beurteilung der Therapiemöglichkeiten geröntgt werden. Die Röntgenuntersuchung ermöglicht die Bestätigung der Frakturdiagnose und die Bestimmung der Frakturkonfiguration für eine korrekte Entscheidung über die Frakturversorgung [6].…”

Section: Fraktureigenschaftenunclassified

Konservative Frakturbehandlung bei Hund und Katze

Stütz¹,

Forterre²

2023

kleintier konkret

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Fraktureigenschaftenunclassified

Konservative Frakturbehandlung bei Hund und Katze

Stütz¹,

Forterre²

2023

kleintier konkret

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Different materials and methods have been clinically applied. Rigid coaptation is needed in treatment of certain fractures to hold fracture alignment and allow minimal amount of motion at the fracture site during healing (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Rigid coaptation methods include full cylinder casts made of plaster of Paris or synthetic cast materials that rigidly immobilize at least two joints.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanical Evaluation of Soft Cast (Scotchcast, 3M) and Conventional Rigid and Semi-rigid Coaptation Methods

Rytz¹,

Aron²,

Foutz³

et al. 1996

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryA clinically relevant model was created to mechanically evaluate different rigid and semi-rigid coaptation methods. Modulus of elasticity, yield stress, resilience and stiffness was measured to describe material strength and structure stiffness. Rigid Vetcast Plus, 3 M (VCP), new semi-rigid Softcast Scotchcast, 3 M (SC), conventional semi-rigid fibreglass slab reinforced modified Rober t Jone s (SMRJ ) bandages, and modified Robert Jones (MRJ ) bandages were tested with different thicknesses or configurations. Rigid (VCP) was the strongest and stiffest coaptation method. The reason for this was a strong bond between fibres and resin and between layers. New semi-rigid (SC) was the strongest of the semi-rigid coaptation methods followed by (SMRJ ) bandages and (MRJ ) bandages. With semi-rigid (SC) imperfections and voids in bond allowed some shear movement between fibres and resin and between layers giving cylindrical structures some resilience. Stiffness of semi-rigid (SMRJ ) was influenced by the position of the slab relative to the bending plane. Compressed cotton with semi-rigid (MRJ ) had very limited resistance to a bending force.New semi-rigid Softcast Scotch-cat, 3M (SC) was mechanically evaluated in an in vitro external coaptation model and compared to rigid Vetcast Plus, 3M (VCP), semi-rigid fibreglass slab reinforced modified Robert Jones (SMRJ) bandages, and modified Robert Jones (MRJ) bandages. Vetcast Plus (VCP) was overall the strongest, Scotchcast (SC) was the strongest of the semi-rigid coaptation methods.

show abstract

Application of Temporary Splints

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Konservative Frakturbehandlung bei Hund und Katze

Konservative Frakturbehandlung bei Hund und Katze

Mechanical Evaluation of Soft Cast (Scotchcast, 3M) and Conventional Rigid and Semi-rigid Coaptation Methods

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About