2000
DOI: 10.1002/1099-1085(200009)14:13<2293::aid-hyp29>3.0.co;2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of TELEMAC-2D in a narrow estuarine tributary

Abstract: The numerical model TELEMAC‐2D is applied to a tributary of the Weser estuary, the Hunte. In this tributary a high percentage of the incoming tidal energy is dissipated in a system of narrow bends. An estimation for the amount of energy dissipation resulting from bottom friction and turbulent dispersion is presented, which indicates that the latter plays an important role in this system. Therefore the advection schemes offered in TELEMAC‐2D are compared with respect to their numerical diffusion. Copyright © 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As both models are fully non linear (see Hervouet, 2002, Malcherek, 2000, for details of TELEMAC, and Chen et al 2003 for details of FVCOM), and contain "wetting and drying" (see for example Chen et al (2008) and Karna et al (2011) for a detailed discussion of "wetting and drying" and references to algorithms for implement it), which occurs when the total water depth falls below 0.05m, then they contain all the necessary physics for generating higher harmonics of the tide in shallow water. As the physics of higher harmonic generation is given in Davies 1986, Filloux and Snyder 1979, Heaps 1978, Inoue and Garret 2007, LeProvost 1991, Walters and Werner 1991, it will not be discussed here.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Equations and Model Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As both models are fully non linear (see Hervouet, 2002, Malcherek, 2000, for details of TELEMAC, and Chen et al 2003 for details of FVCOM), and contain "wetting and drying" (see for example Chen et al (2008) and Karna et al (2011) for a detailed discussion of "wetting and drying" and references to algorithms for implement it), which occurs when the total water depth falls below 0.05m, then they contain all the necessary physics for generating higher harmonics of the tide in shallow water. As the physics of higher harmonic generation is given in Davies 1986, Filloux and Snyder 1979, Heaps 1978, Inoue and Garret 2007, LeProvost 1991, Walters and Werner 1991, it will not be discussed here.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Equations and Model Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…model namely TELEMAC (e.g. Hervouet, 2002, Jones and Davies 2005, Malcherek 2000, Nicolle and Karpytchev 2007, under identical conditions of boundary forcing and bottom topography. The form of the hydrodynamic equations and brief details of the models, with references to the literature for more extensive technical details is presented in the next section .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: LISBON-TYPE TSUNAMI IMPACT ON THE UK variable mesh was generated using the TELEMAC-2D hydrodynamic model [Galland et al, 1991;Hervouet, 2000a]. This model has been extensively validated for tides [Malcherek, 2000;Sauvaget et al, 2000;Jones and Davies, 2005] and wind-induced response [Jones and Davies, 2006] in shallow shelf seas. Its capacity to simulate runup well is aided by a wetting-drying scheme that performs well at the finest resolution [Jones and Davies, 2006].…”
Section: C04007mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TELEMAC code has been used very successfully in other shallow water regions (e.g. Malcherek 2000, Heniche et al 2000, Hervouet 2002, Fernandes et al 2002, 2004 and preliminary calculations (JD05) showed that it could reproduce the major features of the tide off the west coast of Britain without any tuning and using boundary forcing and topography taken from a previous uniform finite difference model. The finite element grid of this model is ideal for examining the effects of nearshore dynamics upon higher harmonics of the tide (Jones and Davies 2007a) for a number of reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%