Application of systemic design thinking for program management

Hussaini, Syed W; Vinnakota, T.

doi:10.1109/tencon.2015.7372931

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Be Generative contemplates the structured and systematic way of thinking, based on the creative confidence (Kelley & Kelley 2015), balancing intuition and the analysis of the data obtained in the exploratory process, associating words, exploring new concepts, and integrating new ideas to the existing ones. The higher the number of ideas, the better (Akili 2015;Andreassen et al 2016;Brown & Katz 2009;Carlgren et al 2016;Davis 2010;Dorst 2011;Holloway 2009;Hussaini & Vinnakota 2015;Koliji 2016;Liedtka & Ogilvie 2011Luchs 2016;Rylander 2009;Sato et al 2010;Olsen 2015;Ward et al 2009).…”

Section: Design Thinking Stages and Principlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Design thinking translates observations into insights and insights into innovation through an exploratory, iterative, and non-linear process, which leads to unexpected discoveries since the process is fundamentally exploratory. Design thinking is supported by themes that form its mentality: empathy, curiosity, collaboration, experimentation, visualization, flexibility, and continuous learning (Akili 2015;Andreassen et al 2016;Buchanan 1992;Brown 2008;Brown & Katz 2009;Brown & Martin 2015;Carlgren et al 2016;Gleason & Cherrez 2020;Davis 2010;Dorst 2011;Ferreira et al 2015;Goodspreed et al 2016;Holloway 2009;Hussaini & Vinnakota 2015;IDEO 2015;Jiao & Zhang 2015;Johansson & Woodilla 2009;Koliji 2016;Leverenz 2014;Liedtka 2014; Liedtka e Ogilvie 2011; Lockwood 2009;Luchs et al 2016;Olsen 2015;Rylander 2009; Uehira e Kay 2009;Sato et al 2010;Stickdorn & Schneider 2011;Sköldberg et al 2013;Seidel e Fixson 2013;To & Liu 2021;Vianna et al 2012;Ward et al 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A game to teach and apply design thinking for innovation

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Develop and apply a game to facilitate the use of design thinking for innovation.Method: The construction of the game was based upon the Constructivism Theory. The game was developed following the steps of: (i) understanding the target audience and the context; (ii) defining learning objectives; (iii) structuring the experience; (iv) identifying resources and applying gamification elements; (v) evaluation. Originality/Relevance: Design Thinking emerges as an alternative to improve the innovation process in companies. To facilitate this innovation process, this paper presents a game, through its development and application, based on the principles and stages of Design Thinking, focusing on difficulties of its implementation.Results: The game provides an iterative passage through all stages of the design thinking, giving a holistic view of the process, starting with a deep understanding of the problem, and coming to a design solution.Social / management contributions: The results of the game application have shown its potential to: (i) ease teamwork, avoiding negative discussions and providing active participation from all students; (ii) lead to insight generation in a comprehensible way, making clear the difference between insights and ideas; (iii) simplify the use of inspiring methods and techniques (such as Persona, Empathy Map and Napkin Pitch); (iv) develop creative confidence; (v) provide a pleasant and motivating learning environment for collaborative multidisciplinary work.Theoretical/Methodological contributions: The game provides a method for building serious games and the game as a method of applying Design Thinking for Innovation.

show abstract