Abstract:This chapter discusses the importance of applying methods based on the systems thinking paradigm in analysing accidents that may occur in a complex healthcare system involving telemedicine/telehealth. Different accident analysis approaches (models and methods) have been utilised to analyse incidents/accidents in different safety-critical domains, including healthcare, to identify weaknesses and to be able to propose safety recommendations. With the advent of systemic accident analysis (SAA) approaches based on… Show more
“…Not all models describe the process in detail, as seen in the AcciMap, where certain elements such as feedback availability and system goals are only partially described and implicitly addressed (Underwood & Waterson, 2013). Furthermore, the process and details are provided in the FRAM, and the STAMP goes beyond the mere description of events and causal factors to provide a full description of the reasons for unsafe control actions (Igene & Ferguson, 2023). In this context, models such as STAMP and FRAM are particularly explicit about the safety-related objectives that the system is try-ing to achieve.…”
Section: Models' Analysis Process and System Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, FRAM does not consider multiple contributing factors and actors (Stanton, 2019). The STAMP and FRAM approaches consider more closely the elements per process or function in their analysis, which differs from the AcciMap, which described the events and actions performed in the system (Igene & Ferguson, 2023).…”
Section: The Application Of Systematic Analysis Approaches In the Foo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AcciMap model, for example, enables a comprehensive analysis of the entire FSI. It facilitates the identification of actions, causal links, and factors that contribute to FS problems, such as food contamination incidents, effectively capturing these elements and their interrelationships throughout the system (Igene & Ferguson, 2023). The benefits of the diagrams are that they provide a visual and improved understanding of the nuances of the FSI through its proximal sequence of events, interactions, and mapping of interconnected relationships.…”
Section: The Application Of Systematic Analysis Approaches In the Foo...mentioning
Effective food safety (FS) management relies on the understanding of the factors that contribute to FS incidents (FSIs) and the means for their mitigation and control. This review aims to explore the application of systematic accident analysis tools to both design FS management systems (FSMSs) as well as to investigate FSI to identify contributive and causative factors associated with FSI and the means for their elimination or control. The study has compared and contrasted the diverse characteristics of linear, epidemiological, and systematic accident analysis tools and hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) and the types and depth of qualitative and quantitative analysis they promote. Systematic accident analysis tools, such as the Accident Map Model, the Functional Resonance Accident Model, or the Systems Theoretical Accident Model and Processes, are flexible systematic approaches to analyzing FSI within a socio‐technical food system which is complex and continually evolving. They can be applied at organizational, supply chain, or wider food system levels. As with the application of HACCP principles, the process is time‐consuming and requires skilled users to achieve the level of systematic analysis required to ensure effective validation and verification of FSMS and revalidation and reverification following an FSI. Effective revalidation and reverification are essential to prevent recurrent FSI and to inform new practices and processes for emergent FS concerns and the means for their control.
“…Not all models describe the process in detail, as seen in the AcciMap, where certain elements such as feedback availability and system goals are only partially described and implicitly addressed (Underwood & Waterson, 2013). Furthermore, the process and details are provided in the FRAM, and the STAMP goes beyond the mere description of events and causal factors to provide a full description of the reasons for unsafe control actions (Igene & Ferguson, 2023). In this context, models such as STAMP and FRAM are particularly explicit about the safety-related objectives that the system is try-ing to achieve.…”
Section: Models' Analysis Process and System Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, FRAM does not consider multiple contributing factors and actors (Stanton, 2019). The STAMP and FRAM approaches consider more closely the elements per process or function in their analysis, which differs from the AcciMap, which described the events and actions performed in the system (Igene & Ferguson, 2023).…”
Section: The Application Of Systematic Analysis Approaches In the Foo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AcciMap model, for example, enables a comprehensive analysis of the entire FSI. It facilitates the identification of actions, causal links, and factors that contribute to FS problems, such as food contamination incidents, effectively capturing these elements and their interrelationships throughout the system (Igene & Ferguson, 2023). The benefits of the diagrams are that they provide a visual and improved understanding of the nuances of the FSI through its proximal sequence of events, interactions, and mapping of interconnected relationships.…”
Section: The Application Of Systematic Analysis Approaches In the Foo...mentioning
Effective food safety (FS) management relies on the understanding of the factors that contribute to FS incidents (FSIs) and the means for their mitigation and control. This review aims to explore the application of systematic accident analysis tools to both design FS management systems (FSMSs) as well as to investigate FSI to identify contributive and causative factors associated with FSI and the means for their elimination or control. The study has compared and contrasted the diverse characteristics of linear, epidemiological, and systematic accident analysis tools and hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) and the types and depth of qualitative and quantitative analysis they promote. Systematic accident analysis tools, such as the Accident Map Model, the Functional Resonance Accident Model, or the Systems Theoretical Accident Model and Processes, are flexible systematic approaches to analyzing FSI within a socio‐technical food system which is complex and continually evolving. They can be applied at organizational, supply chain, or wider food system levels. As with the application of HACCP principles, the process is time‐consuming and requires skilled users to achieve the level of systematic analysis required to ensure effective validation and verification of FSMS and revalidation and reverification following an FSI. Effective revalidation and reverification are essential to prevent recurrent FSI and to inform new practices and processes for emergent FS concerns and the means for their control.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.