2003, Las Vegas, NV July 27-30, 2003 2003
DOI: 10.13031/2013.13766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of SWAT and APEX models for Upper Maquoketa River Watershed in Northeast Iowa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional limited indirect testing of APEX was performed by comparing SWAT output (with nested APEX simulations) with measured data, as reported by . More in-depth testing of the combined APEX-SWAT modeling system by Saleh et al (2003) for January 1999 to December 2001 resulted in R 2 values of 0.79 and 0.74 for streamflow and nitrate, respectively, at the UMRW outlet, but weaker streamflow and nitrate R 2 statistics ranging from 0.39 to 0.51 and from 0.24 to 0.42, respectively, for the other three sampling sites ( fig. 10).…”
Section: Umrw Apex Calibration Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additional limited indirect testing of APEX was performed by comparing SWAT output (with nested APEX simulations) with measured data, as reported by . More in-depth testing of the combined APEX-SWAT modeling system by Saleh et al (2003) for January 1999 to December 2001 resulted in R 2 values of 0.79 and 0.74 for streamflow and nitrate, respectively, at the UMRW outlet, but weaker streamflow and nitrate R 2 statistics ranging from 0.39 to 0.51 and from 0.24 to 0.42, respectively, for the other three sampling sites ( fig. 10).…”
Section: Umrw Apex Calibration Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The hydrological component of the SWAT model has been previously validated for several watersheds throughout the USA (Arnold et al, 1998(Arnold et al, , 1999Saleh et al, 2000Saleh et al, , 2003 where representative data are available. To the best of author's knowledge, only few studies have been made regarding the application of physically based hydrological models to Ethiopian catchments among which are Conway (1997), Kebede et al (2006), Lijalem et al (2007), Tadele and Foerch (2007) and Gragne et al (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manure was applied in mid-February while the ground was still frozen prior to planting the corn, and the type of manure used was chicken litter. Even though the nutrient composition of poultry manure varies depending on several factors (such as species, feed ratio, type of litter), P content is generally high compared to cattle manure (at about 30 -50% that of nitrogen) [36] (Nicholson et al). The application of chicken litter in fields that may be considered to have nutrient rich soils can result in the overapplication of P and nutrient transport to surface water [37] (Sharpley et al).…”
Section: Soluble P In Surface Runoffmentioning
confidence: 99%