2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2966566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Sum-of-Squares Method in Estimation of Region of Attraction for Nonlinear Polynomial Systems

Abstract: We present a sum of squares (SOS) method for the synthesis of nonlinear polynomial control systems. As an emerging numerical solution method in recent years, SOS targets polynomials as the research object. It guarantees that the polynomial we solve for is always nonnegative. In this paper, we give a generalized S-procedure to solve the SOS problem. As an illustration of how the SOS method can be used, the region of attraction (ROA) in a nonlinear polynomial system is analyzed in detail. The method of determini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that the loss of control of aircraft is becoming a major cause of catastrophic accidents in aviation, scholars have carried out a lot of research work on this problem, which involves the accurate determination of dynamic boundaries in complex situations (upset conditions). By analyzing the current state of research at home and abroad, the following methods are commonly used to determine the dynamical boundaries: Bifurcation mutation theory [21], Phase plane method [22], Reachable Set estimation method [23][24][25], Stable region estimation method based on differential manifold [26], Region of Attraction (ROA) estimation method based on the sum of squares (SOS) [27], Neural Network (NN) method [28], etc. Among them, Reachable Set is favored by many scholars for its wide application and outstanding performance, and is applied in the determination of flight safety boundaries.…”
Section: Methods Of Determining Flight Safety Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the loss of control of aircraft is becoming a major cause of catastrophic accidents in aviation, scholars have carried out a lot of research work on this problem, which involves the accurate determination of dynamic boundaries in complex situations (upset conditions). By analyzing the current state of research at home and abroad, the following methods are commonly used to determine the dynamical boundaries: Bifurcation mutation theory [21], Phase plane method [22], Reachable Set estimation method [23][24][25], Stable region estimation method based on differential manifold [26], Region of Attraction (ROA) estimation method based on the sum of squares (SOS) [27], Neural Network (NN) method [28], etc. Among them, Reachable Set is favored by many scholars for its wide application and outstanding performance, and is applied in the determination of flight safety boundaries.…”
Section: Methods Of Determining Flight Safety Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, this means that if the dynamical system starts inside G, it will converge to the goal state, x g , as time t goes to infinity. Sum-of-squares techniques are the basis for a large number of algorithms estimating regions of attractions for non-linear systems [30].…”
Section: Region Of Attractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, by finding the positively invariant set where the limit cycle lies, and by requiring conditions to hold only in this set thereby easing the computation, we are able to prove the stability of limit cycles for systems of higher dimension. Indeed, SOS programmes have recently been used to establish region of attractions but have been demonstrated using a system of dimension two only [20]. On the other hand, the method presented recently in [29] does offer means to obtain excellent approximation for attractors of higher dimensions using semidefinite programming; hence, we think of the approach presented in this paper as an alternative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%