2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10124445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Strongly Constrained Space Particle Swarm Optimization to Optimal Operation of a Reservoir System

Abstract: In view of the low efficiency of the particle swarm algorithm under multiple constraints of reservoir optimal operation, this paper introduces a particle swarm algorithm based on strongly constrained space. In the process of particle optimization, the algorithm eliminates the infeasible region that violates the water balance in order to reduce the influence of the unfeasible region on the particle evolution. In order to verify the effectiveness of the algorithm, it is applied to the calculation of reservoir op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the optimization algorithm is easy to converge too quickly, resulting in the loss of population diversity in the early stage, and the global optimal solution cannot be found. Therefore, the strong constraint optimization problem has a high demand on the ability of the algorithm to jump out of the local optimum and the ability of global search [ 49 ]. According to the experimental results in this section, under different upper bounds, the value of the objective function obtained by WOA is better in both the optimal conditions [ 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the optimization algorithm is easy to converge too quickly, resulting in the loss of population diversity in the early stage, and the global optimal solution cannot be found. Therefore, the strong constraint optimization problem has a high demand on the ability of the algorithm to jump out of the local optimum and the ability of global search [ 49 ]. According to the experimental results in this section, under different upper bounds, the value of the objective function obtained by WOA is better in both the optimal conditions [ 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have studied on the difference optimization algorithms for long term power generation scheduling, which can be divided into deterministic optimization methods and stochastic optimization methods (Labadie 2004). The deterministic optimization methods regard the runoff process as known and the dispatching process is past-oriented, which consists of linear (Needham et al 2000)and nonlinear programming (Cai et al 2001), dynamic programming (Feng et al 2018, Marano et al 2012, genetic algorithms (Baskar et al 2003, Yun et al 2010) and particle swarm optimization (Ma et al 2018, etc. Unfortunately, because of the limitation of runoff forecast accuracy, deterministic optimization methods cannot be used to guide the actual reservoir operation directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization algorithms have therefore been increasingly applied to formulate reservoir flood control operation strategies, effectively addressing the shortcomings of conventional methods [8]. In the past decades, a wide range of optimization algorithms have been proposed that can generally be classified into conventional optimization algorithms and heuristic intelligent algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%