1962
DOI: 10.1021/ac60182a034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Stripping Analysis to the Trace Determination of Tin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrochemical stripping analysis has been employed for tin determination by several workers. Anodic stripping voltammetry at a mercury electrode gave detection limits in the region of 10 27 M. 13,14 Recently, the application of adsorptive stripping voltammetry for the determination of tin at various electrodes has also been reported, with detection limits ranging from 2 3 10 210 to 2 3 10 25 M. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] In spite of the increasing importance of the chemically modified electrode (CME) as an electroanalytical tool, our literature search (not exhaustive) turned up only two reports employing CMEs for tin determination, both using a batch system. Yang et al 22 used a Nafion film modified glassy carbon electrode for preconcentration of Sn(IV) by cation exchange, followed by cathodic stripping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Electrochemical stripping analysis has been employed for tin determination by several workers. Anodic stripping voltammetry at a mercury electrode gave detection limits in the region of 10 27 M. 13,14 Recently, the application of adsorptive stripping voltammetry for the determination of tin at various electrodes has also been reported, with detection limits ranging from 2 3 10 210 to 2 3 10 25 M. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] In spite of the increasing importance of the chemically modified electrode (CME) as an electroanalytical tool, our literature search (not exhaustive) turned up only two reports employing CMEs for tin determination, both using a batch system. Yang et al 22 used a Nafion film modified glassy carbon electrode for preconcentration of Sn(IV) by cation exchange, followed by cathodic stripping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The stripping voltammetry of tin is complicated by the presence of other electroactive metals in the sample and its complex electrochemistry that involves its tendency to polymerize and hydrolyze. Phillips and Shain [23] circumvented these problems by using a supporting electrolyte of 1.2 M HCl for the determination of tin in complex alloys and steel samples. DeMars [24] used an electrolyte containing 0.10 M ammonium thiocyanate and 0.020 M pyrogallol for the determination of tin and indium in binary alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical cyclic voltammogram obtained at HDME in 1.2 M HCI containing Sn(IV) and Pb(II) at 2 X 1 and 2 X 10"6 molar concentration, respectively, is shown in Figure 1A. The cathodic portion of the voltammogram shows, around -0.3 V vs. SCE, a broad ill-defined, peak-shaped curve (ß ) which can be attributed to the reduction process Sn(IV) -*• Sn(II) which is known (12) to proceed irreversibly. The sharp peak (a2), observed around -0.5 V, results (12) from the overlap of the reduction processes for Sn(II) -Sn(Hg) and Pb(II) -Pb(Hg).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sn(II) -Sn(IV) process cannot be recorded (12) because it takes place at more positive potential values than for the oxidation of mercury. The tin-lead interference is common to any acidic matrix including real samples normally treated by a strong acid before being analyzed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%