Application of Spatial-Temporal Behavioral Trajectory Analysis in the Space Design of Digital Villages

Abstract

From the perspective of the environment-behavior science, this paper takes the space design of a digital village in Youzhaqiao Village on the outskirts of Guangshui City, for example, to record and track the behavior of residents and tourists in the area via mobile phone motion track recording software. Based on the collection, selection, and collation of the trajectory data, the valid data has been counted and analyzed; finally, the field investigation and questionnaires have been integrated to propose optimization strategy for the use and design of the space of Youzhaqiao Village from aspects such as human perception, cognition, and behavior.

Comprehensive evaluation of digital village development in the context of rural revitalization: A case study from Jiangxi Province of China

“…At present, the theoretical research and practical application of digital countryside are primarily concentrated in developed countries and regions, such as the United States, the European Union [ 15 ], Australia [ 16 ], Ireland [ 17 ], and Poland [ 18 ], while little attention is paid to the rural digitalization policies or planning plans in developing countries [ 19 ]. At the same time, it can be seen that the core of national digital rural establishment is not identical.…”

Performance and sustainability evaluation of rural digitalization and its driving mechanism: evidence from Hunan province of China

“…Currently, a large number of studies are on the digitization of tourism-based (Ciolac, 2022;Rodrigues, 2023), climate changeresponsive (Ho, 2014;Galiwango, 2022), and historical and cultural preservation-based (Huang, 2020;Qi, 2022) villages because the market and the government provide sufficient capital support for their digitization and smartening. Some scholars also attribute the research related to rural e-commerce and smart characteristic towns to the field of rural digitalization (Leong, 2016;Li, 2022).…”

“…Most papers in this field mainly discuss national scale rural digitalization planning, policies, experiences, lessons, opportunities, and barriers in the paradigm of case studies and empirical research (Fennell, 2018;Alabdali, 2023). For example, scholars from different countries, based on case studies or local development actuality, have analyzed the practice and progress of rural digitization in pioneer or leading countries, including the United States (Li, 2020), the European Union (Adesipo, 2020), Australia (Park, 2017;Randell-Moon, 2022), Slovenia (Zavratnik, 2018), Canada (Spicer, 2018), Ireland (McGuire, 2022, Poland (Adamowicz, Wojcik, 2021), Spain (Escalona-Orcao, 2016, and China (Li, 2022). A few scholars have analyzed the driving mechanism of rural digitization and its evolution, investigating the influence and nature of the role of different factors from economic, social, environmental and other dimensions.…”

“…The capacity for economic development is also a fundamental driver of rural digitization, so the impact of the scale and stage of economic development should be taken into account, which is represented by the GDP indicator chosen in this paper (Perez-Martinez, 2023). Rural digitization is currently at the stage of self-sufficiency driven by government investment, and in this paper the fiscal selfsufficiency rate is chosen to represent the government's ability to intervene (Zhao, 2021c;Li, 2022). Education level determines digital literacy and urban earning ability, and the average length of education is chosen to represent their impact on rural Frontiers in Environmental Science frontiersin.org digitalization and population urbanization (Cambra-Fierro, 2022;.…”