2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-2716(02)00062-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of snakes and dynamic programming optimisation technique in modeling of buildings in informal settlement areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been argued that snakes provide a more robust and elastic option for locating the boundaries of features in remote sensing imagery [126]. Rüther et al [74] used snakes to extract dwellings from contours derived from an nDSM of the Marconi Beam and Manzese slum settlements in Cape Town, South Africa and Dar es Salaam in Tanzania respectively. In that study, an extraction accuracy of 62% was reported with an overall 81% rooftop shape extraction accuracy.…”
Section: Building Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been argued that snakes provide a more robust and elastic option for locating the boundaries of features in remote sensing imagery [126]. Rüther et al [74] used snakes to extract dwellings from contours derived from an nDSM of the Marconi Beam and Manzese slum settlements in Cape Town, South Africa and Dar es Salaam in Tanzania respectively. In that study, an extraction accuracy of 62% was reported with an overall 81% rooftop shape extraction accuracy.…”
Section: Building Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ioannidis et al [92], simple DSM approaches include not only slum dwellings but also other artifacts such as vegetation, which leads to reduced extraction accuracy. Also, stereo image matching techniques traditionally used for generating DSM suffer from insufficient ground sampling data, poor image quality and degradation from shadows and occlusions, which obstruct the outlines of buildings [72,74,128]. Contour models can alleviate some of these limitations, however, they have been criticized for first having to be initialized [129], and encounter difficultly in distinguishing objects with similar height [92].…”
Section: Building Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A qualitative method checks the quality of estimated dominant directions and derived footprints by visually comparing the extracted footprints with those in maps and aerial photographs. The quantitative method examines the accuracy by extending the count-based metric method proposed by Shufelt and Mckeown [3] and area-based metric method suggested by Ruther et al [4]. The count-based metric method quantifies commission and omission errors in the number of buildings identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b. This operation compares the ratio R of the area of the triangle P 2 P P 3 to that of triangle P 1 P P 4 . If the R is less than the threshold T Ratio, the four points P 1 , P 2 , P 3 , and P 4 are replaced with points P 1 , P and P 4 .…”
Section: Estimated Dominant Directions Are the Same As The Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to our work, two publications are to be mentioned in particular. In the first one, informal settlement areas are the subject of research, as well, but a different optimization technique, the dynamic programming optimization, is applied to semi-automatically extract buildings from aerial photographs [26]. The second one uses the same optimization method as we do, mixed-integer linear programming (cf.…”
Section: Introduction To Optimization and Technical Operations Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%