2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of sensory evaluation, GC-ToF-MS, and E-nose to discriminate the flavor differences among five distinct parts of the Chinese blanched chicken

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the volatile compounds from different varieties of pork could be well-differentiated by nanoelectronic smelling analysis, which is a potentially viable method for evaluating pork. Similar to the study by Yuan Xu et al [ 12 ], the discrimination of pork breeds provides a good reference for nanoelectronic smelling in distinguishing food grades, sources, and parts.…”
Section: Nanoelectronic Smelling: Analysis Of Animal-based Foodsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the volatile compounds from different varieties of pork could be well-differentiated by nanoelectronic smelling analysis, which is a potentially viable method for evaluating pork. Similar to the study by Yuan Xu et al [ 12 ], the discrimination of pork breeds provides a good reference for nanoelectronic smelling in distinguishing food grades, sources, and parts.…”
Section: Nanoelectronic Smelling: Analysis Of Animal-based Foodsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Yuan Xu et al [ 12 ] studied flavor differences in five different parts of Chinese cut chicken (skin, breast, leg, head, and buttocks) using a nanoelectronic smelling array equipped with 14 sensors, each sensitive to hydrogen sulfide, sulfide, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, and aromatic compounds, respectively. The analysis of the results revealed 137 volatile compounds, including 21 hydrocarbons, 7 aldehydes, 10 ketones, 53 alcohols, 10 esters, 6 furans, 11 acids, 15 miscellaneous compounds, and 4 sulfur-containing compounds.…”
Section: Nanoelectronic Smelling: Analysis Of Animal-based Foodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An orientation sample from an extra steak was evaluated, and the scores were given by the panel discussion at one time before each session. Unsalted crackers and drinking water were served to avoid the cross-link effects between samples [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a difference was in accordance with the results of sensory evaluation. In previous studies, E-nose sensor signals were shown to have a certain correlation with sensory attributes [48,49].…”
Section: Sensory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 96%