2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of semipermeable membrane device (SPMD) to assess air genotoxicity in an occupational environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where passive samplers such as PUF or semipermeable membrane devices have been used to monitor PAH in either ambient (Cupr et al, 2006) or indoor and outdoor air in an occupational exposure setting (coke plant) (Bonetta et al, 2009), the highest genotoxic effects are associated with locations where the highest PAH levels have been accumulated by these samplers. Similarly, we previously determined that differences in the potency of AhR activity in indoor vs. outdoor air sampled by PUF passive air samplers reflected potential PAH profiles, although many of the carcinogenic PAHs were not detected (Kennedy et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Where passive samplers such as PUF or semipermeable membrane devices have been used to monitor PAH in either ambient (Cupr et al, 2006) or indoor and outdoor air in an occupational exposure setting (coke plant) (Bonetta et al, 2009), the highest genotoxic effects are associated with locations where the highest PAH levels have been accumulated by these samplers. Similarly, we previously determined that differences in the potency of AhR activity in indoor vs. outdoor air sampled by PUF passive air samplers reflected potential PAH profiles, although many of the carcinogenic PAHs were not detected (Kennedy et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While relatively few studies (Isidori et al, 2003; Cupr et al, 2006; Slapsyte et al, 2006; Bonetta et al, 2009; Kennedy et al, 2009) have combined passive air sampling with effect based techniques, these samplers potentially provide a more convenient and cost effective means of monitoring the potential for biological effects resulting from exposure to complex mixtures in a range of scenarios. Since the compounds which will be sampled by these PUF samplers are those present predominantly in the vapour phase and in respirable particle size ranges (Chaemfa et al, 2009a), it is likely that effect based estimates derived from these samples will be particularly relevant from an inhalation toxicology perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect-based monitoring of exposures sampled by passive air samplers has been utilised previously in ambient air for monitoring mutagenicity, genotoxicity, AhR activity and cytotoxicity [1722]. These studies have typically expressed the potency of effect on a per sampler basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, the techniques used to monitor environmental pollutants should enable direct monitoring of the fate and concentration of chemical pollutants as well as evaluation of their effects and the potential hazard for human health. Estimation of human exposure to toxic and genotoxic environmental pollutants is a fundamental aspect of human hazard assessment [3,4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%