1995
DOI: 10.1002/mas.1280140603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of secondary ion and matrix‐assisted laser desorption‐ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for the quantitative analysis of biological molecules

Abstract: This review primarily focuses on the current status of two solid‐state mass spectrometric (MS) techniques, namely, static secondary‐ion (SIMS) and matrix‐assisted laser desorption‐ionization (MALDI) time‐of‐fight (TOF) maSs spectrometry, as applied to the quantification of biological materials. Although a number of articles have appeared in the literature for both SIMS and MALDI quantitative analysis, neither field has been extensively researched nor currently used in general practice. However, several results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although proteins with characteristics unlike those of the analyte may be used as internal standards (as has been shown during protein quantification directly from mixtures (18,19) or during MALDI-TOF quantification of affinity-retrieved species by addition of an internal reference standard to peptides eluted from beaded affinity reagent (20)), internal reference standards that behave similarly to the analyte during laser desorption/ionization are generally preferred. This prerequisite is met during MSIA by choosing internal references that share sequence homology with the target protein: enzymatic/chemically modified versions of the targeted protein (15,16,21), truncated/ extended recombinant forms of the target proteins, the (same) target protein recombinantly expressed in isotopically enriched medium (e.g., 15 N or 18 O), or the same protein from a different biological species.…”
Section: Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although proteins with characteristics unlike those of the analyte may be used as internal standards (as has been shown during protein quantification directly from mixtures (18,19) or during MALDI-TOF quantification of affinity-retrieved species by addition of an internal reference standard to peptides eluted from beaded affinity reagent (20)), internal reference standards that behave similarly to the analyte during laser desorption/ionization are generally preferred. This prerequisite is met during MSIA by choosing internal references that share sequence homology with the target protein: enzymatic/chemically modified versions of the targeted protein (15,16,21), truncated/ extended recombinant forms of the target proteins, the (same) target protein recombinantly expressed in isotopically enriched medium (e.g., 15 N or 18 O), or the same protein from a different biological species.…”
Section: Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive and well-documented work 13,14 has been done to improve drug quantitation by MALDI-MS since its capabilities were initially reported more than a decade ago, [15][16][17] bringing about the first commercially available MALDI system dedicated to quantitation, FlashQuant (AB/ MDS Sciex). 18 The original matrix-free laser desorption/ ionization (matrix-free LDI) 19 procedure avoids the need to add matrix and eliminates the strong matrix interference in the low molecular weight range present in MALDI-MS; however, the complexity and diversity of the material required in the newer implementations of this method of analysis (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, MALDI-TOF-MS has also been developed to analyze small molecules [13] successfully by using the different matrix substances, such as desorption/ionization on porous silicon (DIOS) [14 -17], matrix with high molecular weight [18,19], surfactant suppressed matrix [20], inorganic materials [21][22][23][24][25], etc. Though considerable works of quantitative determination using MALDI have been well documented and reviewed [26], quantitative analysis by MALDI is still considered as a relatively unreliable technique for the limiting factor of reproducibility within and between sample spots. Recently, Siuzdak and coworkers [27] developed a method for quantitative analysis of small molecules with desorption/ionization on porous silicon using electrospray deposition of analytes, and a quite good quantitative result with linear calibrations R 2 Ͼ 0.99 and values of RSD Ͻ 7% was achieved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%