Application of RPGM Model in Wireless Ad-Hoc Network

Dewangan, Kailash P.; Bonde, Padma

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3170519

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The classical RPGM model and the PSO model were selected for comparison in order to verify the performance of our proposed mobility model in terms of dynamic networking. It is experimentally compared with the ASMM proposed in this paper from four perspectives: average link survival, average neighbour rate [7,8], average path change rate and end-to-end delay [9,10] of the network.…”

Section: Evaluation Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Collaborative Mobility Model based on the Archimedean Spiral of Group Intelligence

Shi

Wang

Zhang

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Existing mobility models in the military domain focus on reconnaissance, siege and tracking, with fewer node movement scenarios for high-altitude precision military strikes.This paper combines the motion characteristics of Archimedean spiral and the idea of cluster mobility model to cluster nodes within the cluster and use the cluster head node to control nodes within the cluster to achieve intelligent node control. And our model is compared with the classic PSO and RPGM models. Experiments show that our proposed mobile model has excellent network performance and movement capability compared to the POS and RPGM models, and has broad application prospects.

show abstract

Section: Evaluation Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Collaborative Mobility Model based on the Archimedean Spiral of Group Intelligence

Shi

Wang

Zhang

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Firstly, nodes are independent on each other. Secondly, nodes are memoryless, and so, the new speed and direction of the nodes are independent on their previous speed and direction [86]. Thirdly, nodes can move at any speed within a range (e.g., 30-460 km/h [20]).…”

Section: Pure Randomized Mobility Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Routing Schemes in FANETs: A Survey

Khan

Yau

Noor

et al. 2019

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Flying ad hoc network (FANET) is a self-organizing wireless network that enables inexpensive, flexible, and easy-to-deploy flying nodes, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), to communicate among themselves in the absence of fixed network infrastructure. FANET is one of the emerging networks that has an extensive range of next-generation applications. Hence, FANET plays a significant role in achieving application-based goals. Routing enables the flying nodes to collaborate and coordinate among themselves and to establish routes to radio access infrastructure, particularly FANET base station (BS). With a longer route lifetime, the effects of link disconnections and network partitions reduce. Routing must cater to two main characteristics of FANETs that reduce the route lifetime. Firstly, the collaboration nature requires the flying nodes to exchange messages and to coordinate among themselves, causing high energy consumption. Secondly, the mobility pattern of the flying nodes is highly dynamic in a three-dimensional space and they may be spaced far apart, causing link disconnection. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of the limited research work of routing schemes in FANETs. Different aspects, including objectives, challenges, routing metrics, characteristics, and performance measures, are covered. Furthermore, we present open issues.

show abstract