2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of robust iterative learning algorithm in motion control system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…c2) The number of learning iteration j is larger than a given value and the relative ratio of synchronous error ε rel is greater than a given value, that is, j ≥ J 0 and ε rel ¼ ε rms;j ε rms;jÀ1 ≥ e rr (22) Criterion c1 is obvious since in general the ultimate goal is to reduce the error without ILC by a certain amount of percentage after learning. c2) The number of learning iteration j is larger than a given value and the relative ratio of synchronous error ε rel is greater than a given value, that is, j ≥ J 0 and ε rel ¼ ε rms;j ε rms;jÀ1 ≥ e rr (22) Criterion c1 is obvious since in general the ultimate goal is to reduce the error without ILC by a certain amount of percentage after learning.…”
Section: L4) Perform the Systematic Algorithm Proposed Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…c2) The number of learning iteration j is larger than a given value and the relative ratio of synchronous error ε rel is greater than a given value, that is, j ≥ J 0 and ε rel ¼ ε rms;j ε rms;jÀ1 ≥ e rr (22) Criterion c1 is obvious since in general the ultimate goal is to reduce the error without ILC by a certain amount of percentage after learning. c2) The number of learning iteration j is larger than a given value and the relative ratio of synchronous error ε rel is greater than a given value, that is, j ≥ J 0 and ε rel ¼ ε rms;j ε rms;jÀ1 ≥ e rr (22) Criterion c1 is obvious since in general the ultimate goal is to reduce the error without ILC by a certain amount of percentage after learning.…”
Section: L4) Perform the Systematic Algorithm Proposed Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be categorized into time domain [17] or frequency domain [18], depending on the analysis and implementation of the ILC algorithm. Based on the output errors in the previous operation cycle, the former is used to modify the control inputs [19], and the latter to modify the commands [20][21][22]. Based on the output errors in the previous operation cycle, the former is used to modify the control inputs [19], and the latter to modify the commands [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of ILC is to determine a control input iteratively, resulting in plant's ability to track the given reference signal or the output trajectory over a fixed time interval. Owing to its simplicity and effectiveness, ILC has been found to be a good alternative in many areas and applications, see recent surveys for detailed results [7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when there is periodic disturbance, the approaches proposed in [1] and [2] may fail to attain satisfactory tracking performance. In order to overcome this difficulty, this paper proposes a control structure that employs an Iterative Learning Control (ILC) scheme [3,4] to suppress periodic external disturbance. ILC has been shown to be very effective in dealing with systems with periodic disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a command-based ILC has been developed in [3] to compensate for friction, disturbance, and modeling error. Tsai et al further developed a robust ILC to improve positioning accuracy of a bi-axial motion control system [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%