2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of response surface method for predicting electroless nickel plating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) The phosphorus content of deposits is decreased with increasing pH and temperature, but it is increased with lactic acid concentration. (3) The hardness of Ni-P deposits is increased with increasing pH and temperature, whereas lactic acid concentration has no effect on Ni-P deposit hardness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The phosphorus content of deposits is decreased with increasing pH and temperature, but it is increased with lactic acid concentration. (3) The hardness of Ni-P deposits is increased with increasing pH and temperature, whereas lactic acid concentration has no effect on Ni-P deposit hardness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies related to implementation of experimental design for nickel plating process have been reported in literature (Oraon et al, 2006;Bai, 2001a, 2001b). Oraon et al (2006) have applied the response surface method for predicting of electroless nickel plating process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oraon et al (2006) have applied the response surface method for predicting of electroless nickel plating process. In this respect, authors have used a central composite design (CCD) for experimentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electroless Ni composite coatings have been widely produced [21][22][23] and electroless Ni-P-SiC composite coatings are recognised for their high hardness and wear resistance [24][25]. However, Ni is more expensive than Cu, and Cu coatings can be considered as a replacement for Ni coatings because of its low resistivity and high electromigration resistance as one of the most attractive materials for future devices [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%