2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Raman spectroscopy for depth-dependent evaluation of the hydrogen concentration of amorphous silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is ignored that H outdiffusion can generate quite different depth profiles of hydrogen concentration, depending strongly on the a-Si:H material structure (compact or void-rich material) and on the properties of the film surface and the film-substrate interface. 37,57,58 Conclusions from optical (absorption) measurements toward the annealing temperature appear only possible if the depth dependence of the hydrogen concentration (or of the optical bandgap) is measured in the annealed state. Indeed, evaluation of hydrogen outdiffusion depth profiles (for rather small H diffusion lengths) may be an alternative way to determine the H diffusion coefficient 37,58 and thus the temperature in the laser spot (see Sec.…”
Section: Relationship Between Hydrogen Diffusion Length and Photo-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is ignored that H outdiffusion can generate quite different depth profiles of hydrogen concentration, depending strongly on the a-Si:H material structure (compact or void-rich material) and on the properties of the film surface and the film-substrate interface. 37,57,58 Conclusions from optical (absorption) measurements toward the annealing temperature appear only possible if the depth dependence of the hydrogen concentration (or of the optical bandgap) is measured in the annealed state. Indeed, evaluation of hydrogen outdiffusion depth profiles (for rather small H diffusion lengths) may be an alternative way to determine the H diffusion coefficient 37,58 and thus the temperature in the laser spot (see Sec.…”
Section: Relationship Between Hydrogen Diffusion Length and Photo-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the emergence of the C peak was hydrogen annealing caused new chemical bonds between graphene layer and the FINEMET ribbon, such as Si-H and Si-H 2 bond. 14 There were three main effects for the FINEMET/ graphene composite ribbons during the hydrogen annealing process: [15][16][17][18][19] the rst was to remove contaminants (PMMA, etc. ), the second was to saturate the surface metal dangling bonds, and the third was to form hydrogen bonds and Si-H bonds to increase adhesion between the FINEMET ribbon and graphene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the relative change in the H signal at these annealing steps was measured by Raman spectroscopy using Horiba‐Yvon LabRAM at an excitation wavelength of 532 nm. Raman spectroscopy was also used to measure the H microstructure parameter ( R H ) [ 17 ] , the short‐range order (SRO), and the medium‐range order (MRO). [ 18 ] H concentration ( C H ) was measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) on reference a‐Si:H samples deposited on crystalline silicon wafer substrates and used for estimating the H concentration in the investigated samples deposited on glass substrates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both Raman and infrared spectroscopy, the relative H content in the Si–H stretching modes was measured by fitting two Gaussian peaks centered at 2000 and 2090 cm −1 to the complex Si–H stretching vibration signal. [ 17 ] Hydrogen effusion measurements were performed as reported in the literature, [ 19 ] using a heating rate of 20 °C min −1 . For secondary‐ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) measurements, a time of flight instrument (TOF.SIMS‐5.NCS, Iontof GmbH, Münster, Germany) was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%