IJCNN'99. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36339)
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.1999.830798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of radial basis function networks to model electric arc furnaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The load characteristics can be reflected by the signal energy in different sub-bands. Then, the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) [10,11] is used to design a smart method to detect the serial arc faults. The line current waveforms of the system under normal operation or a serial arc fault are used to train the RBFNN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The load characteristics can be reflected by the signal energy in different sub-bands. Then, the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) [10,11] is used to design a smart method to detect the serial arc faults. The line current waveforms of the system under normal operation or a serial arc fault are used to train the RBFNN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 Predicting the EAF's reactive power by creating a neural network to enhance compensator performance is proposed in the literature. 28,29 Several papers use fuzzy logic 30 or adaptive fuzzy 31,32 in developing their models. A hybrid wavelet transform and a neural-network-based approach is used in Chang et al 33 to present a dynamic model for EAF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , EAF is modeled using the chaotic dynamics. Radial basis function (RBF) networks are used in to model EAF v–i characteristic, and the results are compared with multi‐layer perceptron networks. In , the application of adaptive fuzzy logic systems (FLS) to model EAFs is presented, and the results are compared with FLS and RBF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%